疑义澄清:“人的本质是一切社会关系的总和”探微
发布时间：2019-08-09 18:34
【摘要】：人的本质是一切社会关系的总和。对此命题的理解需要澄清近年来出现的三个疑义:其一,人的本质"是且仅是"一切社会关系的总和吗?认为此命题"非定义,仅为特征性描述"的观点有如下理由:被定义者与定义者不等质;"在其现实性上"是明显的限制条件;与"理想人"相冲突;属于不成熟的"青年马克思"思想。其二,"一切社会关系的总和"应当肯定还是批判?持批判性观点的理由在于:肯定性观点源自对文本自身的"误读",且与落脚点"改变世界"相背离。其三,强调"一切社会关系的总和"与"实践"是否冲突?认为相冲突的观点有如下理由:这是一种环境决定论思想,人被社会环境控制并导致异化,且静态的社会关系缺乏活跃的实践品质。通过对这些问题的深入剖析,得以厘清此命题的应有之义:在马克思主义中,人的本质在现实中的定在就是社会性,这种社会性就是马克思一直强调的,基于物质资料生产的实践活动上的"一切社会关系的总和"。
[Abstract]:The essence of man is the sum of all social relations. The understanding of this proposition needs to clarify three doubts that have emerged in recent years: first, is the nature of man "the sum of all social relations"? There are the following reasons for the view that this proposition is "non-defined and only characteristic description": the defined person is not equal to the definer; "in its reality" is an obvious restriction; it conflicts with the "ideal man"; and belongs to the immature thought of "young Marx". Second, should "the sum of all social relations" be affirmed or criticized? The reason for the critical view is that the affirmative view originates from the "misreading" of the text itself and deviates from the foothold "changing the world". Third, does it emphasize whether "the sum of all social relations" conflicts with "practice"? It is believed that there are the following reasons for the conflict of views: this is a kind of environmental determinism, people are controlled by the social environment and lead to alienation, and the static social relations lack the active practical quality. Through the in-depth analysis of these problems, we can clarify the proper meaning of this proposition: in Marxism, the essence of human beings is defined in reality as sociality, which Marx has always emphasized, and the "sum of all social relations" in the practical activities based on material production.
【作者单位】： 湖北大学哲学学院;
【分类号】：B038
本文编号：2524936
[Abstract]:The essence of man is the sum of all social relations. The understanding of this proposition needs to clarify three doubts that have emerged in recent years: first, is the nature of man "the sum of all social relations"? There are the following reasons for the view that this proposition is "non-defined and only characteristic description": the defined person is not equal to the definer; "in its reality" is an obvious restriction; it conflicts with the "ideal man"; and belongs to the immature thought of "young Marx". Second, should "the sum of all social relations" be affirmed or criticized? The reason for the critical view is that the affirmative view originates from the "misreading" of the text itself and deviates from the foothold "changing the world". Third, does it emphasize whether "the sum of all social relations" conflicts with "practice"? It is believed that there are the following reasons for the conflict of views: this is a kind of environmental determinism, people are controlled by the social environment and lead to alienation, and the static social relations lack the active practical quality. Through the in-depth analysis of these problems, we can clarify the proper meaning of this proposition: in Marxism, the essence of human beings is defined in reality as sociality, which Marx has always emphasized, and the "sum of all social relations" in the practical activities based on material production.
【作者单位】： 湖北大学哲学学院;
【分类号】：B038
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 王贵明;试论物质资料生产决定作用的局限性[J];求是学刊;1982年06期
2 杨思基;;人类三种根本性生产的相互关系[J];聊城师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);1993年04期
3 王安琦;;论直接生活的生产和再生产[J];宝鸡师院学报(哲学社会科学版);1989年01期
4 胡钧;;人类社会的基本结构——《历史唯物论—社会发展史讲座》之六[J];中华魂;2003年07期
5 蔡俊生;;“双氏族群婚”概念和“阿注”婚姻形式——关于物质资料生产和人本身生产的关系[J];国内哲学动态;1981年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 贵州大学经济学院在读硕士研究生 李明叶;浅谈恩格斯的两种社会生产[N];呼和浩特日报(汉);2010年
，本文编号：2524936
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2524936.html
