语境的基础融贯主义——论语境主义辩护的结构
发布时间：2019-08-12 10:30
【摘要】：基础主义与融贯主义是相互竞争的知识辩护理论。它们执迷于知识的绝对真理性质,错失了知识的语境性。这导致两种辩护观都存在无法克服的难题。基础主义和融贯主义之间存在其他知识辩护理论的逻辑空间。语境的基础融贯主义试图融合基础主义和融贯主义,克服基础主义和融贯主义的难题。语境主义的知识辩护以特定语境下的实用真理为目标,是"挑战—辩护"过程中的动态活动,是可错的、历时的、公共的。基于此,语境主义的辩护观认为,知识辩护既有其基础,又必须融贯。辩护的基础性通过界定"语境的初始辩护"概念得到说明,而辩护的融贯性则来自先验框架。
[Abstract]:Foundationalism and cohesion are competing theories of knowledge defense. They are obsessed with the absolute truth nature of knowledge and miss the context of knowledge. This leads to insurmountable problems in both views of defense. There is a logical space for other theories of knowledge defense between foundationalism and cohesion. The basic coherence of context tries to combine foundationalism and cohesion to overcome the difficult problem of foundationalism and cohesion. The knowledge defense of situationalism, which aims at the practical truth in a specific context, is a dynamic activity in the process of "challenge-defense", which is wrong, diachronic and public. Based on this, the view of situational defense holds that knowledge defense not only has its foundation, but also must be integrated. The foundation of defense is explained by defining the concept of "initial defense of context", and the consistency of defense comes from a transcendental framework.
【作者单位】： 华南师范大学公共管理学院;
【分类号】：B08
本文编号：2525654
[Abstract]:Foundationalism and cohesion are competing theories of knowledge defense. They are obsessed with the absolute truth nature of knowledge and miss the context of knowledge. This leads to insurmountable problems in both views of defense. There is a logical space for other theories of knowledge defense between foundationalism and cohesion. The basic coherence of context tries to combine foundationalism and cohesion to overcome the difficult problem of foundationalism and cohesion. The knowledge defense of situationalism, which aims at the practical truth in a specific context, is a dynamic activity in the process of "challenge-defense", which is wrong, diachronic and public. Based on this, the view of situational defense holds that knowledge defense not only has its foundation, but also must be integrated. The foundation of defense is explained by defining the concept of "initial defense of context", and the consistency of defense comes from a transcendental framework.
【作者单位】： 华南师范大学公共管理学院;
【分类号】：B08
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈明益;;语境主义对知识的辩护与困境[J];洛阳师范学院学报;2012年09期
2 张晒;;从文本中心主义到历史语境主义:语境、概念与修辞[J];理论月刊;2013年05期
3 尹维坤;;语境转换:归赋者语境主义之症结[J];自然辩证法研究;2013年07期
4 曹剑波;;语境主义的异议与辩护[J];徐州工程学院学报(社会科学版);2014年01期
5 苏娅;;历史语境主义作为哲学史研究方法的价值与限度[J];理论界;2011年05期
6 王娜;;科学是客观的还是社会建构的?——语境主义角度的解读[J];科学学研究;2010年05期
7 陈晓平;;盖梯尔问题与语境主义[J];哲学分析;2013年03期
8 杨修志;常红;;走出语境主义的困境——两种新摩尔主义的策略[J];自然辩证法研究;2014年06期
9 方菲;钟旗珈;;略谈语境主义的认识论——从对笛卡尔的质疑开始[J];濮阳职业技术学院学报;2014年03期
10 阳建国;;归因者语境主义与怀疑论问题[J];哲学动态;2009年10期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 王学文;利益相关不变主义对归因者语境主义的挑战[D];中山大学;2010年
2 于明;语境主义理论能否走出怀疑论困境[D];山东大学;2011年
，本文编号：2525654
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhexuezongjiaolunwen/2525654.html
