执行性立法“抵触”的判定标准及其应用方法

发布时间：2018-01-15 10:43

本文关键词：执行性立法“抵触”的判定标准及其应用方法　出处：《华东政法大学学报》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：不同的地方立法类型对应着不同的抵触类型,进而有着不同的判定标准和方法。执行性立法既可能只构成直接抵触,不构成间接抵触;也可能同时构成直接抵触和间接抵触。但无论何种情形,均需妥善处理形式主义和实质主义的关系。直接抵触的判定需要以法律规则的构成要素为基石,明晰立法抵触的判定标准。就义务性规则和职权性规则而言,国家法律应当视为统一性标准;就权利性规则和职责性规则而言,国家法律可以视为最低限度的标准。判定标准的应用需要一套合理的方法,这一方法的具体步骤为:发现上位法规则、要素比较、对应情形和标准、得出结论。
[Abstract]:Different types of local legislation correspond to different types of conflict, and then there are different criteria and methods. Executive legislation may only constitute direct conflict, not indirect conflict; It may also constitute both direct conflict and indirect conflict. However, in any case, the relationship between formalism and substance should be properly handled. The determination of direct conflict should be based on the constituent elements of legal rules. Defining the criterion of legislative conflict. In terms of compulsory rule and authority rule, national law should be regarded as the standard of unity; As far as the rules of rights and duties are concerned, the national law can be regarded as the minimum standard. The application of the judgment standard needs a set of reasonable methods, the concrete step of this method is to discover the rules of upper law. Comparison of elements, corresponding situations and criteria, draw a conclusion.
【作者单位】：厦门大学法学院;
【基金】：福建省社会科学规划项目“设区的市立法权研究”(项目号FJ2016C005)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D920.0
【正文快照】： 目次一、引言二、抵触判定中的悖论及其应对三、直接抵触的情形与判定标准四、直接抵触的判定方法和应用五、结论一、引言地方立法不得与上位法相抵触是我国宪法和《立法法》《地方组织法》等法律一贯坚持的基本原则。然而,这一原则的内容却十分模糊,何为不抵触

【相似文献】