作为一般人格权的人格尊严权——以德国侵权法中的一般人格权为参照

发布时间：2018-01-15 11:27

本文关键词：作为一般人格权的人格尊严权——以德国侵权法中的一般人格权为参照　出处：《清华法学》2014年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：虽然人格权立法在我国已经提上议事日程,但如何克服具体人格权规则因涵摄能力不足导致个体人格利益无法在法律上获得充分救济这一难题,在我国法律实践中仍存在较大问题。对此,德国最高法院通过法律续造发展出的一般人格权规则,尽管因其所要调整处理的人格利益的多样性而存在内在紧张,然而由于它所赖以确立的基本价值以及相应外部规则的巧妙设计,使得这种内在的紧张得以消弭。而同样是司法实践的产物,我国侵权法中的作为一般人格权的人格尊严权,却因赖以确立的基本价值本身存在的缺陷以及外部适用规范的不完善,而使得补充具体人格权规则涵摄能力不足这种规则确立时所预设的目的无法得到实现。这也决定了该规则在嗣后立法中被舍弃的命运。
[Abstract]:Although the right of personality legislation has been put on the agenda in our country, but how to overcome the specific rules of personality rights because of the lack of capacity to absorb the individual personality interests can not get adequate relief in the law. There are still large problems in our country's legal practice. For this reason, the German Supreme Court has developed the rule of general personality right through law, although there is inherent tension because of the diversity of personality interests that it has to adjust and deal with. However, because of the basic value it depends on and the clever design of the corresponding external rules, this internal tension can be eliminated, and it is also the product of judicial practice. In our tort law, the right of human dignity, as a general personality right, is due to the defects of the basic value itself and the imperfection of the external applicable norms. However, it is impossible to achieve the presupposition purpose of supplementing the rule of personality right which is not enough to contain the rule, which also determines the fate of the rule being abandoned in subsequent legislation.
【作者单位】：中央财经大学法学院;
【基金】：中央财经大学科研创新团队支持计划资助
【分类号】：D951.6;D923
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出在德国侵权法上,一般人格权作为德国最高法院法律续造的产物,是人格利益保护领域联结法典向丰富社会现实开放与丰富社会现实向法典输入新鲜血液的纽带,该规则自被确立之日起,即因能够充分涵摄具体人格权之外其他应受法律保护之人格利益并为之提供相应侵权法上的

【参考文献】