对明嘉靖《问刑条例》修订及相关问题的考论

发布时间：2018-01-23 03:33

本文关键词： 《问刑条例》嘉靖祖制大礼议　出处：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：嘉靖《问刑条例》是在弘治十三年《问刑条例》基础上修订、增补而成的明代中后期重要刑事立法，其修订提议在嘉靖帝在位期间数次提出，但迟至嘉靖二十七年方奉旨编修，嘉靖二十九年正式颁行，对嘉靖《问刑条例》编修工作的讨论议决过程与“大礼议”等政治斗争在时间点上有一定的对应关系，两者的联系也体现出明代祖制及皇权对立法进程的影响。嘉靖帝即位之前的武宗朝乱政积弊甚多，官员贪风日盛，宗室、豪强侵占民地，阶级矛盾激化，明朝统治面临着极为严重的危机，嘉靖《问刑条例》适应了社会形势在弘治《问刑条例》颁布半个世纪以来的剧烈变化，在内容上具有自身的显著特点——完善了限制、打击宗藩势力的相关规定和赎刑、充军的相关规定；严惩官吏、军职贪渎犯罪，限制官吏、军职特权；严格维护封建礼教；维护国家经济秩序；打击各地大户豪强势力；限制、打击流民活动等。与弘治《问刑条例》相比，嘉靖《问刑条例》新增条款较多，所涉及到的法律规范更趋丰富，且立法技术也较弘治《问刑条例》有了显著提高。嘉靖《问刑条例》的颁行，维护和加强了明代中央集权政治，，缓和了阶级矛盾，对明朝社会发展及法制演进起到了一定的积极作用，可以说，嘉靖《问刑条例》较好地反映和满足了社会现实和司法实践的需要。此外，本文对喻茂坚上疏建议修订《问刑条例》的时间，主持修订嘉靖《问刑条例》的官员、以及嘉靖《问刑条例》的颁布时间、条数等问题做出了一定考证。
[Abstract]:Jiajing "interrogation punishment Ordinance" was amended on the basis of Hongzhi's Thirteen years "interrogation punishment Ordinance", which was added to the important criminal legislation in the middle and late Ming Dynasty, and its amendment proposal was put forward several times during the reign of Jiajing Di. But as late as 27 years of Jiajing edict, Jiajing 29 years officially promulgated. The discussion on the editorial and revision of Jiajing's "interrogation and punishment regulations" has a certain corresponding relationship with the political struggles such as "Great Rite discussion" and so on. The connection also reflects the influence of the ancestor system and imperial power on the legislative process in the Ming Dynasty. Before Emperor Jiajing ascended the throne, Wuzong Dynasty had many problems, such as corruption of officials, imperial clan, occupation of people's land, intensification of class contradictions, and the rule of Ming Dynasty was faced with a very serious crisis. Jiajing "interrogation punishment regulations" adapted to the social situation in the Hongzhi "interrogation punishment regulations" issued half a century of drastic changes, in terms of content has its own remarkable characteristics-perfect the restrictions. The relevant provisions of attacking the forces of suzerainty and the punishment of foreclosure, the relevant provisions of retribution; Severe punishment of officials, military corruption crimes, restrictions on officials, military privileges; Strict maintenance of feudal ethics; To maintain the national economic order; Crack down on the powerful and powerful forces of large households in various places; Restrict, crack down on the activities of displaced persons, etc. Compared with Hongzhi's "interrogation and punishment regulations", Jiajing "interrogation punishment regulations" has more new provisions, and the legal norms involved are more abundant. The enactment of Jiajing "interrogation punishment regulations" safeguarded and strengthened the centralization of power in the Ming Dynasty and alleviated the class contradictions. It has played a positive role in the social development and the evolution of the legal system in the Ming Dynasty. It can be said that Jiajing "interrogation punishment regulations" reflects and meets the needs of social reality and judicial practice. In addition, this paper suggests the time of revision of the interrogation regulations, the officials who presided over the revision of Jiajing, and the time of promulgation of Jiajing. The number and other problems made a certain textual research.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D929;D924

【参考文献】