中国近代刑法继受的肇端和取向——以1907年大清新刑律草案签注为视角的考察

发布时间：2018-01-26 17:11

本文关键词： 大清新刑律草案签注礼法之争　出处：《政法论坛》2014年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：1907年由沈家本主持的修订法律馆上奏《大清新刑律》草案,在中国法律史上迈出了系统继受西方刑法的第一步。从1908年开始陆续上奏的中央各部院堂官、地方督抚的签注,对草案的不同意见涉及了立法目的、立法宗旨、价值取向、定罪与量刑理论、立法条件与配套措施等多个方面。1910年《修正刑律草案》附加按语,对签注意见进行了反馈与回应。这一过程表明,1907年刑律草案基本认同和遵循了西方近代法哲学的逻辑进路和价值判断,忽视并否定了中国传统法历史学的逻辑要求和价值存在,这导致《大清新刑律》中大量传统刑法的"本土资源"被废弃,出现了不少纯属"食洋不化"的规定。这既与中国自身的状况相脱节,也不符合法律自身的演进规律,是一次有着严重缺陷的立法实践。中国近代刑法继受的成功,有赖于法哲学逻辑和法历史学逻辑的统一。
[Abstract]:In 1907, Shen Jiaben presided over the revised Law Museum on the "Great fresh Criminal Law" draft. In the history of Chinese law, the first step of the system followed by western criminal law was taken. Since 1908, the endorsements of central ministers and magistrates, local governors and governors, the different opinions on the draft have been related to the legislative purpose. Legislative purpose, value orientation, conviction and sentencing theory, legislative conditions and supporting measures, etc. In 1910, the draft revised Criminal Law added notes. The process of feedback and response to the endorsements shows that in 1907 the draft criminal law basically recognized and followed the logical path and value judgment of western modern philosophy of law. It ignores and negates the logical requirement and value of the history of Chinese traditional law, which leads to the abandonment of a large number of "native resources" of traditional criminal law in the Great New Criminal Law. There have been quite a few regulations that are purely "eating foreign", which is out of touch with China's own situation and does not conform to the law itself's evolution. The success of Chinese criminal law in modern times depends on the unity of the logic of philosophy of law and the logic of history of law.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院法学所;
【分类号】：D929;D924;K25
【正文快照】： 1902年至1911年的晚清十年刑法改革,其间因《大清新刑律》的制定而发生“礼法之争”尤为后人所瞩目。中国法律史学界对此问题的研究,在实然层面,因为最近几年《清末法制变革史料》[1]、《晚清民国刑法史料辑注》[2]、《大清新刑律立法资料汇编》[3]的陆续整理出版而认识已趋向

【相似文献】