《龙筋凤髓判》真实案件研究

发布时间：2018-01-27 10:52

本文关键词： 龙筋凤髓判真实案件唐律疏议　出处：《沈阳师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：《龙筋凤髓判》是中国古代一部著名的拟制判词集。判词是判决书的旧称,也叫作断语、结论,而拟制判词是唐代备选官吏准备任职考试的练习之作。经霍存福教授《龙筋凤髓判判目破译:张澾判词问目源自真实案例、奏章、实事考》一文考证,《龙筋凤髓判》问目或为真实案例、奏章、实事改编而成。而黄源盛教授在《唐律与龙筋凤髓判》一文中对霍存福教授的说法不甚赞同。本文内容之一即考证是否存在更多实例来佐证霍存福教授关于《龙筋凤髓判》判目系真实案件的主张。鉴于《龙筋凤髓判》作者为唐初张澾,笔者将《龙筋凤髓判》的判目与唐初的正史、野史等相对照,在霍存福教授考证的真人、真事的基础上,找出了多个与史料相契合的人和事。笔者认为,《龙筋凤髓判》虽为拟判,但其判目却源自真实案件、公事、奏议等,而其判词则是张澾运用律令、礼法、情理等进行的个人创作。本文以《唐律疏议》、《唐令拾遗》等法律规定为大前提,以霍存福教授考证及本文增补、校正的《龙筋凤髓判》的真人、真事为小前提,分析张澾断案的法律依据及案件推理。本文主要分三章进行论述。第一章,分析《龙筋凤髓判》作者张澾的生平、该书的成书情况及其判目与唐初真实案件的渊源关系。第二章,逐个阐释已考证的张澾判词问目的来源及理由,并结合唐初律令进行案件分析,以体现张澾对律令的娴熟运用。第三章,将未考证出来源的张澾判词问目与相似度高的唐初案件进行对比分析,以后者佐证张澾断案的合于法理、顺乎人情。
[Abstract]:The judgment of Longjin Fengsui is a famous fictitious judgment set in ancient China. The judgment is the old name of the judgment, also known as the sentence, conclusion. And the fictitious judgment is the Tang Dynasty candidate officials to prepare for the practice of the post examination. By Professor Huo Cunfu < long Jin Feng marrow judgment to decipher: Zhang Yu judgment asked the eyes from the real case, playing the seal, the examination of the actual matter "a textual research." "Longjin Fengpiu judgment" question or for the real case, playing the seal. But Professor Huang Yuan-sheng did not agree with Professor Fok Cunfu in Tang Law and the judgment of Longjin Feng Pulp. One of the contents of this paper is to find out whether there are more examples to support Professor Fok Cunfu's theory of "Dragon". In view of the author of "Longjin Fengpiu judgment", the author is Zhang Yu in the early Tang Dynasty. The author contrasts the judgment of "Longjin Fengsui judgment" with the official history and the wild history in the early Tang Dynasty. On the basis of the real person and the real thing verified by Professor Huo Cunfu, the author finds out a number of people and things that agree with the historical data. Although Longjin Fengpiu judgment is intended to be decided, its judgment is derived from real cases, official business, and performance, etc. The judgment is based on Zhang's personal creation with the use of decrees, etiquette, and reason. In this article, the author uses "Tang Ruoshou". "Tang Ling" and other legal provisions as the major premise, with Professor Fok Cunfu textual research and this article, the correction of the "long Jin Feng Pulp judgment" real people, the real thing is a small premise. This paper is mainly divided into three chapters to discuss. The first chapter is to analyze the author's life. The second chapter explains the origin and reason of Zhang Yu's judgment on the purpose and reason of the textual research, and analyzes the case in combination with the law and order of the early Tang Dynasty. In order to reflect Zhang's skillful application of the law. Chapter three, the author contrasts Zhang's judgment with the case of the early Tang Dynasty, which has high similarity, which proves the conformity of the legal principle of Zhang's case.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D929

【相似文献】