中俄未成年人刑事责任之比较研究

发布时间：2018-01-28 07:13

本文关键词： 比较研究刑事政策规制模式特别保护　出处：《南昌大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：未成年人犯罪是世界各国面临的社会问题,因此,探讨未成年人刑事责任的认定与追究,也就成了各国刑法学界共同关注的问题,本文以比较分析的方法,对中国与俄罗斯联邦未成年人刑事责任的刑事政策、规制模式、承担刑事责任的年龄范围以及前科制度进行分析研究,使读者了解俄罗斯联邦未成年人刑事责任法律制度及相关法律理念,并通过比较分析,反思我国的相关制度,以期促进我国未成年人刑事责任立法的完善。全文共分为四部分,约30000字。第一部分：由于刑事责任概念的各不相同,对其首先进行列举,并提出本文的观点,即刑事责任可以表述为：是由刑事法律规定的,因实施犯罪行为产生的,由司法机关强制犯罪者承受的刑事惩罚或单纯否定性法律评价的负担。其次展开叙述未成年犯刑事责任的理论依据包括国家亲权理论以及恤幼的中国传统法律观。第二部分：比较中俄两国未成年人刑事责任的刑事政策。第三部分：比较中俄两国未成年人的刑事责任规制模式,其中包括总的模式和相对承担刑事责任的范围模式。第四部分：比较中俄两国未成年人的前科制度。相信通过不断完善我国的司法制度,就能缩小我国与俄刑法间存在的差异。落实我国“宽严相济”的刑事政策,使对未成年人的保护更趋向于国际标准的特别保护原则。
[Abstract]:Juvenile delinquency is a social problem all over the world. Therefore, the identification and investigation of juvenile criminal responsibility has become a common concern in the criminal law circles of various countries. This paper uses the method of comparative analysis. This paper analyzes the criminal policy, regulation model, age range of criminal responsibility and criminal record system of minors in China and the Russian Federation. This paper makes readers understand the legal system of criminal responsibility of minors in Russian Federation and related legal concepts, and through comparative analysis, reflects on the relevant systems of our country, in order to promote the perfection of legislation on juvenile criminal responsibility in our country. The full text is divided into four parts, about 30000 words. The first part: due to the different concepts of criminal responsibility, it is first listed, and put forward the point of view of this article. That is, criminal liability can be expressed as: is stipulated by the criminal law, because of the commission of criminal acts. The burden of criminal punishment or purely negative legal evaluation imposed on offenders by the judiciary. Secondly, the theoretical basis for describing criminal liability of juvenile offenders includes the theory of parental authority of the state and the traditional Chinese legal view of child-friendly. Part II:. The third part: the comparison of the Chinese and Russian juvenile criminal liability regulation model. It includes the general model and the range model of relative criminal responsibility. Part 4th: comparing the criminal record system of Chinese and Russian minors. I believe that through the continuous improvement of the judicial system of our country. It can narrow the difference between Chinese criminal law and Russian criminal law, carry out our criminal policy of "combining leniency and severity", and make the protection of minors more close to the special protection principle of international standard.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D924.1;D951.2

【参考文献】