“事律”与“民法”之间——中国“民法史”研究再思考

发布时间：2018-02-05 00:58

本文关键词： 民法事律事实规范意义　出处：《政法论坛》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：自晚清法律改革,民、刑分立观念扎根中土,在中国旧地寻觅民法踪迹的旅程便已开始。这种尝试,在不同时期,因了不同需求,或受不同刺激,而有不同的表现。在历史研究中使用现代概念、范畴和分类既不可避免,也是必要的和有益的,但应明确区分事实与规范、功能与意义两个层面,如果运用不当,这种研究很容易变成当代人的偏见甚至研究者个人好恶在历史中的投射,而产生对历史的遮蔽和扭曲。为此,在非西方历史研究中,研究者应该把源自西方的现代概念视为具有认识意义的参照,而非用来解释历史的标准。应超越各种非此即彼、黑白分明的历史叙述,面对高度复杂、微妙的历史与社会现象,既能深入其中,又能出乎其外,通过审慎的比较和深入的分析,辨析不同传统的同中之异、异中之同。
[Abstract]:Since the law reform of the late Qing Dynasty, the concept of separation of the people and the criminal law has taken root in the middle of China, and the journey of finding traces of civil law in the old land of China has begun. It is inevitable, necessary and beneficial to use modern concepts, categories and classifications in historical studies, but we should clearly distinguish between facts and norms, functions and meanings. If used improperly, this kind of research will easily become the prejudice of contemporary people and even the projection of personal likes and dislikes in history, which will result in the obscuration and distortion of history. For this reason, in the non-western historical research. Researchers should regard modern concepts originating in the West as reference with cognitive significance, not as standards for interpreting history. They should go beyond various historical narratives, which are either or or or, black or white, and face a high degree of complexity. The subtle historical and social phenomena can not only go deep into them, but also go beyond them. Through careful comparison and in-depth analysis, we can distinguish and analyze the differences and differences between different traditions.
【作者单位】：中国艺术研究院中国文化研究所;
【分类号】：D929
【正文快照】： 一位人类学家在回顾其研究生涯时说,当他们着手研究异文化法律制度的时候,当地那些与众不同的法律范畴的存在不断地让他们质疑“民事的”和“刑事的”这两个强有力的西方法范畴。在他们看来,这两个范畴是源于一个特定的西方法律家传统的文化建构(cultural constructs),如今正

【相似文献】