考生诉司法部司考信息公开案的法律问题分析

发布时间：2018-02-05 03:57

本文关键词： 司法考试信息信息公开工作秘密公开机制制度完善　出处：《甘肃政法学院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：司法考试是我国法官、检察官、律师等法律职业的初选考试,只有通过国家司法考试,才有资格担任法官、检察官和从事律师等法律职业。其因记忆量大、难度高、通过率低等特点,有“中华第一考”之称。正因如上特点,司法考试的公平性一直受到瞩目。但是,从司法考试制度确立开始,几次第四卷分数分差过大引起了民众尤其是考生的质疑,也导致一些考生对司法部提起诉讼,本文介绍的一起考生诉司法部司考信息公开案便是其中的典型。笔者通过一系列研究,发现本案中反映出现我国司法考试信息公开制度的一些不足之处:比如“工作秘密”作为不公开的理由被滥用、《政府信息公开条例》的效力等级过低等。通过以上研究中发现的问题,笔者试图寻找一些完善司法考试信息公开制度的方法:如明确司考信息公开的内容、限制“工作秘密”的使用、完善司法考试信息公开的制度等。
[Abstract]:Judicial examination is the primary examination of legal profession such as judges, prosecutors, lawyers and so on in our country. Only by passing the national judicial examination, can we be qualified as judges, prosecutors and lawyers. The difficulty is high, the passing rate is low and so on, which is called "the first examination in China". Because of the above characteristics, the fairness of the judicial examination has been attracting attention. However, from the establishment of the judicial examination system. Several times the scores of the fourth volume were too wide to cause people, especially candidates, to question, but also led to some candidates against the Ministry of Justice. This paper introduces a examinee v. the Department of Justice examination information disclosure case is one of the typical. The author through a series of studies. Found in this case reflects the emergence of our judicial examination information disclosure system some deficiencies: for example, "work secrets" as a reason for non-disclosure of the abuse. Through the problems found in the above research, the author tries to find some ways to improve the information disclosure system of judicial examination, such as clarifying the content of the information disclosure. Restrict the use of "work secret" and perfect the system of information disclosure of judicial examination.
【学位授予单位】：甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D920.5;D922.1;D926.15

【相似文献】