美国专利确认之诉诉讼要件理论研究

发布时间：2018-02-05 21:04

本文关键词： 专利诉讼确认利益确认之诉确认不侵权之诉　出处：《复旦大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在国际知识产权诉讼中,美国专利诉讼最为典型。了解美国专利诉讼的被告防御方法特别是确认不侵权诉讼,将有助于提高我国企业维护自身权益的能力。本文对美国专利诉讼确认之诉的诉讼要件进行全面、深入地研究与探讨,并在此基础上提出如何构建与完善我国的专利权确认之诉制度。对这一问题的研究,是理论研究、司法实践与产业界的迫切需要。本文共分为四部分：第一部分：美国专利确认之诉制度概述。本章简单介绍了美国专利权确认之诉的历史沿革及法理基础；提起专利确认之诉的方式与效果；诉讼文件提出的内容与撰写方式。第二部分：美国专利确认之诉诉讼要件。美国专利确认之诉法律要件的发展自出现以来主要经历了两个时期：(1)联邦巡回上诉法院判断是否受理确认之诉,传统上是以是否具有实际上争议与合理忧虑来判断的。(2)在Med Immune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.案判决后,美国最高院法院认为应公平衡量双方之所有状况及客观环境事实后,谨慎判断受理确认之诉,有扩大了受理确认之诉的范围的趋势。第三部分：介绍了美国确认之诉的两种特殊诉讼的诉讼要件。强制反诉制度与权利人提起的确认之诉。第四部分：美国专利确认之诉法律要件制度对我国的专利诉讼制度的借鉴及启示。不论过去、现在、将来的法律关系及法律基础事实,只要诉之利益符合确认利益的法理基础,即原告“有即受判决之法律上利益”时,就允许提起确认之诉。法院受理确认之诉应权衡“原告为保护其法律上地位有无起诉之必要”及“被告在诉讼上之防御权”,公平衡量当事人双方利益。
[Abstract]:In international intellectual property litigation, patent litigation in the United States is the most typical. It will help to improve the ability of Chinese enterprises to protect their own rights and interests. This paper makes a comprehensive and in-depth study and discussion on the litigation requirements of the patent litigation confirmation in the United States. On the basis of this, the author puts forward how to construct and perfect the system of patent right confirmation in China, which is an urgent need of theoretical research, judicial practice and industry. This paper is divided into four parts: This chapter briefly introduces the history and legal basis of patent confirmation action in the United States. The way and effect of filing patent confirmation action; The content and writing method of litigation documents. The second part: the litigation requirements of patent confirmation in the United States. The development of the legal elements of patent confirmation in the United States has mainly experienced two periods since its emergence. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decided whether to accept the confirmation complaint. Traditionally, it is judged by whether there is a real dispute and reasonable anxiety) after the Med Immune, Inc.Genentech, Inc. decision. After the Supreme Court of the United States held that all the conditions and objective environmental facts of both parties should be judged fairly, it was prudent to judge and accept the confirmation action, which had the tendency of enlarging the scope of accepting the confirmation action. In the third part, the author introduces two kinds of special litigation elements, compulsory counterclaim system and confirmation action brought by the right holder in the United States of America. Part 4th: the reference and enlightenment of the legal elements system of patent confirmation in the United States to the patent litigation system of our country. The legal relationship and the legal basis facts in the past, present and future regardless of the past, the present and the future. As long as the interests of litigation conform to the legal basis of the recognition of interests, that is, if the plaintiff "has the legal interests to be adjudicated". The court should weigh "the plaintiff is necessary to protect his legal status" and "the defendant's defense right in litigation", and weigh the interests of both parties fairly.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D971.2;DD915.2

【相似文献】