对超高定价行为的反垄断规制——基于典型案例的分析

发布时间：2018-02-09 12:48

本文关键词： 超高定价反垄断规制典型案例经营者承诺　出处：《价格月刊》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：超高定价是反垄断法中最具争议的议题之一。对美、欧、韩、中的几起典型案例分析发现,对超高定价行为的反垄断规制存在着两种截然不同的模式,即竞争状态下的"自由放任"模式和不利消费者情形下的"规制"模式,两者各有其合理性。中国秉承消费者福利优先理念,基于本身竞争文化、市场环境等因素考量,选择"规制"模式,值得肯定。但需要注意的是,为了避免破坏市场价格机制、造成执法错误,对超高定价的反垄断规制必须采取审慎态度,即在充分论证市场存在较高进入障碍、经营者具有市场支配地位及行业监管不力的前提下进行。同时,可通过优先选择性适用经营者承诺制度、优化超高定价行为的认定方法及加强与行业协会监管部门的合作等措施,以提高执法效率。
[Abstract]:Ultra-high pricing is one of the most controversial issues in anti-monopoly law. The analysis of several typical cases in the United States, Europe, South Korea, and China shows that there are two different modes of anti-monopoly regulation on ultra-high pricing behavior. That is, the "laissez-faire" model in the state of competition and the "regulation" mode in the case of unfavorable consumers have their own reasonableness. China adheres to the concept of consumer welfare priority, considering factors such as its own competitive culture, market environment, etc. The choice of "regulation" mode is worthy of recognition. However, in order to avoid destroying the market price mechanism and causing law enforcement errors, we must take a prudent attitude towards the anti-monopoly regulation of ultra-high pricing. That is, on the premise of fully demonstrating the existence of higher barriers to entry in the market, the dominant position of the operators in the market and the weak supervision of the industry, at the same time, the system of undertakings of operators can be applied through preferential and selective application. To improve the efficiency of law enforcement, we should optimize the identification methods of ultra-high pricing behavior and strengthen cooperation with the regulatory authorities of industry associations.
【作者单位】：江西财经大学法学院;东华理工大学长江学院;
【分类号】：D920.5;D922.294

【相似文献】