论南京国民政府时期土地所有权的限制——以私法社会化为背景

发布时间：2018-02-13 10:28

本文关键词： 土地所有权私法社会化限制私权保护　出处：《湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：19世纪末,受社会学法学的影响,"私法社会化"思潮风靡欧美。私法社会化思潮对近代所有权神圣原则进行了修正,主张社会利益对所有权的限制。在移植西方近代法律体系的艰辛历程中,南京国民政府时期的法学家和立法者将私法社会化思潮视为最前沿的法学理论,并将狄骥的"所有权社会职务说"奉为圭臬。《中华民国民法》和《土地法》虽承认土地私人所有,但对私人土地所有权的范围、面积、客体、移转、使用等施加了诸多限制,从而将私法社会化理念通过立法转化为具体的制度实践。这使得近代中国在颁行第一部正式民法典之时,就与所有权神圣原则擦肩而过。清季法律改革以来,虽建立了比较完备的西方法律体系,但始终没有滋养出市民社会自由与权利的观念,因此,私权保护仍有现实意义。
[Abstract]:At the end of 19th century, under the influence of sociological jurisprudence, "socialization of private law" became popular in Europe and the United States. The trend of socialization of private law amended the sacred principle of modern ownership. In the course of transplanting the western modern legal system, jurists and legislators in the period of Nanjing National Government regarded the trend of socialization of private law as the most advanced legal theory. The Civil Law of the Republic of China and the Land Law recognize the private ownership of land, but they impose many restrictions on the scope, area, object, transfer and use of private land ownership. Thus, the socialization idea of private law was transformed into concrete system practice through legislation, which made modern China pass by the sacred principle of ownership when the first official civil code was enacted. Although a relatively complete western legal system has been established, it has never nurtured the concept of civil society freedom and rights. Therefore, the protection of private rights still has practical significance.
【作者单位】：华中科技大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.3;D929

【共引文献】