论程序法治

发布时间：2018-02-22 10:28

本文关键词： 程序法治形式法治实质法治　出处：《社会主义核心价值观研究》2016年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："法治"是一个有争议的概念。在诸种争议中,形式法治与实质法治之间的争论,不但在法治理论中对抗性最强,也在法治实践中影响最大。因此,走出形式法治与实质法治的对抗性论争,明确"法治"的内涵,是当代中国法治实践的重要前提。我们认为,关于法治的最大共识是程序法治。如果我们把形式法治和实质法治放在具有内在联系的道德序列的两端,那么,程序法治是居于其间的一种独立形态,而且应该成为法治观念的核心共识。这是因为,一方面,程序法治的价值内涵比形式法治"厚",避免了倒向法律工具主义和人治的危险;另一方面,程序法治的价值内涵又比实质法治"薄",避免了倒向善治、从而模糊法治界限、增加法治不确定性的危险。
[Abstract]:"Rule of law" is a controversial concept. Among all kinds of disputes, the dispute between formal rule of law and substantive rule of law is not only the most confrontational in the theory of rule of law, but also the most influential in the practice of rule of law. It is an important prerequisite for the practice of the rule of law in contemporary China to get out of the confrontational controversy between the formal rule of law and the substantive rule of law and to clarify the connotation of the "rule of law". The greatest consensus on the rule of law is the rule of procedure. If we put the formal rule of law and the substantive rule of law at both ends of the moral sequence with inherent links, the procedural rule of law is an independent form that resides in it. This is because, on the one hand, the value of the procedural rule of law is "thicker" than that of the formal rule of law, thus avoiding the danger of turning backwards into legal instrumentalism and the rule of man; on the other hand, The value connotation of the procedural rule of law is less than that of the substantive rule of law, which avoids the adverse trend towards good governance, thus blurring the boundaries of the rule of law and increasing the risk of uncertainty of the rule of law.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学哲学院;
【基金】：中国人民大学明德青年学者计划“中国法治进程中的若干重大伦理问题研究”(课题编号:13XNJ046)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D90-053

【相似文献】