论社会主义法治理念下的司法公正实现路径
本文关键词: 社会主义法治理念 司法公正 困境 路径 出处:《中南民族大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:公平正义作为法学领域的一个古老话题,一直以来备受各个时期法学流派的争论,而其自身也在此争论的过程中获得了不断的充实,最终成为了法治社会中各个国家追求的价值目标。在我国历史发展的长河中,法治思想一直屈居于人治思想之下,因而也就不可能有真正的公正可言,直至实行依法治国,建设社会主义法治国家方略的提出,我国法治的发展才最终在思想上得到了保障。社会主义法治理念是我国执政党在对国内和国际形势进行系统分析的基础上,提出的新时期建设社会主义法治事业的最新理念,是指导法治发展的最新成果。而司法公正是我国法治建设在司法领域中的价值追求,也是公平正义理念在司法工作中的具体要求,同时也是社会正义的一个必要内容。司法只有做到公正,才能逐渐培养起人们对于法律的信仰,从而使民众逐步摆脱传统人治思想的束缚,在社会生活中树立起法律的权威,懂得用法律维护自身的合法权益。而今,当我们沉浸于法治建设所取得的伟大成果时,我们更应该清醒的看到,在当前情形下,司法改革虽然已开展多年,但是影响司法公正的因素仍然没有得到有效的清除。与此同时,随着时代的发展,影响司法公正的新因素也在不断的涌现,使我国司法公正的实现面临着新的挑战。 本文立足于社会主义法治理念的大背景下,以此理念为契机,,通过比较两大法系国家实现司法公正的模式,并在分析我国实现司法公正路径存在问题的基础上,针对现实社会生活中影响司法公正的因素,提出一种符合我国现实的全新的司法公正实现路径,以期对我国司法公正的实现有所裨益。文章主要包括四个方面的内容: 第一部分,主要分析了社会主义法治理念和司法公正的同构性,从社会主义法治理念五个方面的内容入手,逐条分析了这五方面的内容和司法公正的关系。 第二部分,主要阐述司法公正的内涵和实现模式,主要分析了司法公正的构成要素,两大法系司法公正的实现模式以及我国实现司法公正的模式。 第三部分,通过对我国近几年影响司法公正的典型案例的分析,并与美国辛普森案作对比,找出我国在实现司法公正的过程中主要面临的困境。 第四部分,在社会主义法治理念的指引下,针对我国实现司法公正的困境进行研究,提出一种新的实现司法公正的路径,具体解决司法公正实现过程中的威胁性因素。
[Abstract]:Fairness and justice, as an ancient topic in the field of law, have always been debated by law schools in various periods, and it has been constantly enriched in the process of this debate. In the course of our country's historical development, the thought of the rule of law has always been subordinated to the thought of rule of man, so there can be no real justice to speak of, until we run the country according to law. The idea of socialist rule of law is based on the systematic analysis of the domestic and international situation of the ruling party of our country on the basis of putting forward the general plan of building a socialist country ruled by law, and the development of the rule of law in our country will finally be guaranteed ideologically. The new concept of building socialist rule of law in the new period is the latest achievement to guide the development of the rule of law, and judicial justice is the value pursuit of the construction of the rule of law in the judicial field of our country. It is also the specific requirement of the concept of fairness and justice in judicial work, and it is also an essential part of social justice. Only when justice is done can people gradually cultivate their faith in the law. So that people can gradually get rid of the shackles of the traditional idea of rule of man, establish the authority of the law in social life, and know how to protect their legitimate rights and interests with the law. Now, when we are immersed in the great achievements of the construction of the rule of law, We should also be soberly aware that in the current situation, although judicial reform has been under way for many years, the factors affecting judicial justice have still not been effectively removed. At the same time, with the development of the times, The new factors affecting judicial justice are also emerging, which makes the realization of judicial justice in our country face new challenges. Based on the background of the concept of socialist rule of law, this paper takes this idea as an opportunity to compare the modes of judicial justice between the two legal system countries, and on the basis of analyzing the existing problems in the path of realizing judicial justice in our country. In view of the factors affecting judicial justice in real social life, this paper puts forward a new way to realize judicial justice in line with the reality of our country, in order to benefit the realization of judicial justice in our country. The first part mainly analyzes the isomorphism between the concept of socialist rule of law and judicial justice, starting with the five aspects of the concept of socialist rule of law, and analyzes the relationship between these five aspects and judicial justice one by one. The second part mainly expounds the connotation and realization mode of judicial justice, mainly analyzes the constituent elements of judicial justice, the realization mode of judicial justice in two legal systems and the mode of realizing judicial justice in our country. The third part, through the analysis of the typical cases which affect the judicial justice in recent years, and compared with the Simpson case of the United States, find out the main difficulties that our country faces in the process of realizing the judicial justice. In the 4th part, under the guidance of the concept of socialist rule of law, this paper studies the dilemma of realizing judicial justice in China, and puts forward a new way to realize judicial justice, and specifically solves the threatening factors in the process of realizing judicial justice.
【学位授予单位】:中南民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D926;D920.0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 蒋伟;论舆论监督在建设法治国家中的作用[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2000年01期
2 肖扬;;法院、法官与司法改革[J];法学家;2003年01期
3 马骏驹,聂德宗;当前我国司法制度存在的问题与改进对策[J];法学评论;1998年06期
4 张保成;;勿让“民愤”干扰程序正义——对程序正义的另一种思考[J];法制与社会;2008年16期
5 公丕祥;;当代中国能动司法的意义分析[J];江苏社会科学;2010年05期
6 任永安;;论司法行政化及其解决之道[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年05期
7 谭英;冯杏华;;中国能动司法的内涵分析及制度构建[J];长江大学学报(社会科学版);2010年06期
8 徐迅;中国媒体与司法关系现状评析[J];法学研究;2001年06期
9 姚莉;司法公正要素分析[J];法学研究;2003年05期
10 江必新;;公正司法与法律文本[J];人民司法;2009年17期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 汪夜丰;民众与司法公正[D];华中科技大学;2010年
2 赵文敬;我国新闻舆论监督对司法公正的影响及规范研究[D];河北大学;2011年
3 胡传省;论司法公正的实现途径[D];南京师范大学;2004年
4 凡燕;媒介在构建和谐社会中的作用[D];南京师范大学;2005年
5 张豪;实现司法公正的方法探讨[D];山东大学;2006年
6 张一鸣;网络媒体监督与司法公正[D];黑龙江大学;2010年
本文编号:1545305
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1545305.html