“项目推进”与“制度改革”:比较法视野下的中国法学教育改革路径

发布时间：2018-03-03 01:31

本文选题：法学教育　切入点：制度改革　出处：《交大法学》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文对21世纪以来中国、日本、韩国开展法学教育改革的路径进行了比较,对中国高等法学教育长期以来实行的"项目推进"改革方式的动因和效果进行了分析,梳理了"项目推进"改革方式与近年来日本、韩国法学教育"制度改革"的相似性和差异性,并对不同改革路径进行了要素比较和成效分析。作者认为,当前开展的司法制度改革、法律职业制度改革为中国法学教育推进制度性改革提供了契机,推进法治专门队伍正规化、专业化、职业化,需要完善法学教育、法律职业资格准入、法律职业结构等各方面。作者认为,日本、韩国开展的法学教育制度改革可以实现教育模式的根本变革,但是,这种改革方式也需要更高层面的顶层设计,实行更为精致和细密的要素配置,制度改革的方式也蕴藏着高度的风险。因此,为了切实推进中国法学教育的制度改革,迫切需要开展更为扎实的比较法研究,为从理论上理清高等法学教育、法律职业准入资格考试、法律职业培训、法律职业选任等各个环节之间的关系,提供参考和借鉴。
[Abstract]:This paper compares the ways of the reform of law education in China, Japan and South Korea since 21th century, and analyzes the causes and effects of the "project-push" reform of higher legal education in China for a long time. This paper combs the similarities and differences between the reform mode of "project advance" and the "system reform" of law education in Japan and Korea in recent years, and makes a comparison and analysis of the factors and effects of different reform paths. The current reform of the judicial system and the reform of the legal profession system provide an opportunity for China's legal education to push forward the institutional reform, and to promote the formalization, specialization and professionalism of the specialized contingent of the rule of law, it is necessary to improve the legal education. The author believes that the reform of the legal education system carried out in Japan and South Korea can bring about a fundamental change in the educational model, but this kind of reform also requires a higher level of top-level design. The implementation of a more elaborate and detailed allocation of elements carries high risks in the way of institutional reform. Therefore, in order to effectively promote the institutional reform of China's legal education, it is urgent to carry out more solid comparative law research. In order to clarify the relationship between the higher law education, the qualification examination of the legal profession, the training of the legal profession and the choice of the legal profession in theory, this paper provides a reference and reference.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：中国人民大学决策咨询项目“中、日、韩法治一体化建设、法律人才培养与智库建设”(2015030261)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：G642;D90-4

【相似文献】