论P2P共享服务提供者的刑事责任——以快播案为视角

发布时间：2018-03-04 07:16

本文选题：PP共享与缓存　切入点：中立行为　出处：《环球法律评论》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：P2P共享服务提供者是网络时代的新型犯罪主体。在定罪路径方面,应当区分评价P2P共享与P2P缓存,具体分析集中式与分散式两种网络架构类型,充分运用违法用途与合法用途的比例衡量、是否实施违法用途的鼓励行为、阻止违法用途的成本三个标准,判断具有中立属性的P2P共享服务提供者的可罚性。在罪责根据上,依照以成本效益、责任能力、"守门人"理论为内容的政策型次生责任的法理,P2P共享服务提供者在罪责分担中具有次生性的责任,特别是在直接行为人(P2P共享网络用户)数量庞大根本难以确认具体责任人的情况下,为更好地实现刑罚目的,间接行为人(P2P共享服务提供者)应当承担次生责任,但是,在处罚限度上,与直接行为人的直接责任相比,间接行为人次生责任的承担在刑事政策上应当受到限制。
[Abstract]:P2P shared service provider is a new type of criminal subject in the network age. In the aspect of conviction path, P2P sharing and P2P cache should be distinguished, and the centralized and decentralized network architecture types should be analyzed. Fully use the ratio of illegal use to legal use, whether to implement the illegal use of the incentive behavior, prevent illegal use of the cost of three criteria, determine the neutral nature of P2P sharing service providers' penality.On the basis of guilt, According to the legal theory of policy-type secondary liability based on cost-benefit, responsibility ability, "gatekeeper" theory, P2P shared service providers have secondary responsibility in crime sharing. Especially in the case of the large number of direct perpetrators of P2P shared network users, it is difficult to identify the specific responsible person, in order to better achieve the purpose of punishment, indirect actors should bear secondary responsibility for P2P sharing service providers, but, Compared with the direct responsibility of the direct actor, the assumption of the secondary responsibility of the indirect actor should be restricted in the criminal policy.
【作者单位】：东南大学法学院;
【基金】：2015年度江苏省社会科学基金重大项目“把握互联网‘最大变量’核心问题研究”(14ZD003) 2016年度中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目“《刑法修正案(九)》新增网络犯罪的相对主义司法适用研究”(KYZZ16_0106)的研究成果
【分类号】：D920.5;D924.3

【相似文献】