法律理念与规范逻辑的背离——一个关于法治秩序建构的思考

发布时间：2018-03-05 07:16

本文选题：静态规范体系　切入点：法律理念　出处：《湖南社会科学》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：作为法律规范效力传递理据的司法三段论存在着大小前提性质不同、结论能够揭示出新的真理以及无法进行集合数学操作等方面的缺陷,进一步看,法律适用的所谓涵摄过程实际也只是法律解释的过程。因此,法律的效力来源并非是其上阶规范,而是与之相适应的法律理念。基于此,政府恣意无法从规范的涵盖性缺失中获得理由,"统治良心"的自为也能够促使理性公权力人格的生成,以统治理性束己的政府得以建构。对于司法过程而言,审判结果在形式理性范畴内获得了独立的正当性判断标准,"纯粹的程序正义"模式被矫正为"完善的程序正义",加之"法律漏洞"填补在理据和效力上的确定性得以实现,以法律理念为事的理性司法职业群体获得了身份认同标准。一个要件齐备的、能够支撑法治秩序协调建构的治理系统得以形成。
[Abstract]:Judicial syllogism, which is the basis for the transfer of legal norms' validity, has different properties of large and small premises. The conclusion can reveal the new truth and the failure of collective mathematics operation. The so-called inclusive process of application of law is actually only a process of legal interpretation. Therefore, the source of the effect of the law is not its superior norm, but the legal idea corresponding to it. The arbitrary government can not get the reason from the lack of coverage of the norm, and the self-making of "ruling conscience" can also promote the formation of the personality of rational public power, which can be constructed by ruling the rational government. The trial result obtains the independent criterion of legitimacy in the category of formal rationality, the "pure procedural justice" model is corrected as "perfect procedural justice", and the "legal loophole" fills up the certainty on the basis and effect. The rational judicial professional group which regards the legal idea as the matter has obtained the standard of identity and a governance system which can support the harmonious construction of the order of the rule of law has been formed.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学;
【分类号】：D90

【相似文献】