论私有权的限制——政治哲学的视野

发布时间：2018-03-05 23:25

本文选题：私有权　切入点：限制条款　出处：《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：洛克在最初对私有权的论证中提出了私有权的限制条款,当代学者诺奇克对这一条款进行了重新阐释,并认为"当给予足够的经济赔偿时私有权可以不受限制"。然而,正如金理卡和柯亨两位当代学者所批评的那样,诺奇克对私有权的限制过于宽松,而这必然加深社会成员之间因市场竞争而造成的不平等。西方学者对私有权之限制的争论,对中国当下的现实具有重要的借鉴意义:在农村土地流转、拆迁、购房购车的"限购令",以及征收财产税和遗产税等问题上,私有权的限制对于维护社会的公平正义,实现"共享发展"的发展目标,具有至关重要的意义。
[Abstract]:Locke put forward the restriction clause of private right in his initial argument of private right, which was reinterpreted by contemporary scholar Knochke, who holds that "private right may not be restricted when sufficient financial compensation is given." As two contemporary scholars, Kingrica and Koheng, have criticized, Notchick's restrictions on private rights are too loose, and this is bound to deepen inequality among members of society as a result of market competition. It has important significance for reference to the current reality in China: on the issues of rural land circulation, demolition, purchase of house and car, as well as the collection of property tax and inheritance tax, the restriction of private right is of great importance to safeguard the fairness and justice of the society. It is of vital significance to realize the development goal of "shared development".
【作者单位】：中国人民大学国际关系学院;
【基金】：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目“社会分配中的平等主义研究”(项目批准号:16XNB008)成果
【分类号】：D0;D90

【相似文献】