美国宪法中的时间观

发布时间：2018-03-07 07:12

本文选题：时间观　切入点：古代宪法　出处：《华东政法大学学报》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：时间和宪法理论息息相关,不同的宪法理论对时间具有不同的想象。在源自英国的古代宪法理论中,宪法的正当性被认为奠基于久远的历史。在美国国父们的宪法理论中,宪法被视为政治科学的持续性创造,宪法应当时刻依赖人类的理性。在原旨主义的宪法理论看来,宪法起源于某个特定时间,日常时刻的宪法解释必须寻求宪法的原旨。在演化主义的宪法观看来,宪法是不断演化的,其成长有赖于时间。在以阿伦特为代表的共和主义宪法理论中,时间被设想为会在特定时刻"绽出",只有在特定的时刻人类才能实现真正的自由。在实用主义的宪法理论中,时间被设想为一种未来的状态,宪法以永不停歇的民主实验面向未来。宪法理论中不同的时间观启示我们,应当以非本质主义的态度看待宪法。
[Abstract]:Time is closely related to constitutional theory. Different constitutional theories have different imaginations of time. In the ancient constitutional theory originating in England, the legitimacy of constitution is believed to be based on a long history. In the constitutional theory of the founding fathers of the United States, The constitution is regarded as the continuous creation of political science, and the constitution should always depend on the rationality of mankind. In the constitutional theory of fundamentalism, the constitution originated at a certain time. The interpretation of the constitution at ordinary times must seek its original tenet. From the perspective of an evolutionary constitution, the constitution is evolving and its growth depends on time. In the Republican constitutional theory represented by Arendt, Time is supposed to "pop" at a certain moment, and only at a certain moment can man achieve true freedom. In the pragmatic constitutional theory, time is conceived as a state of the future. The constitution faces the future with the constant democratic experiment. The different time view in the constitutional theory enlightens us that we should treat the constitution with the attitude of non-essentialism.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：D971.2;DD911

【相似文献】