论我国司法解释体制的完善

发布时间：2018-03-13 05:37

本文选题：司法解释　切入点：司法解释体制　出处：《辽宁师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：立法机关拥有立法权,法律是由立法机关制定的；司法机关拥有宪法赋予的司法权,其只能适用法律并无权制定法律的权力,当司法机关审判具体的案例在在适用抽象的法律时即产生解释的必要。从我国司法解释体制的发展来看,专门从事司法解释的机构在我国古代还没有发展起来,但司法解释也发挥了不可忽视的作用。我国现有的司法解释体制是在一定的历史条件下发展起来的。无可置疑,我国现行的司法解释与成文法起到了相辅相成的作用,在司法实践中充分发挥了这一功能。然而我们也应当看到,随着我国立法的不断完善,在特定历史条件下形成的司法解释模式己经不能适应法治现代化的要求,我国现行的司法解释存在解释主体混乱,法、检解释效力矛盾等问题。在目前这种社会转型期,大量法律法规出台,立法与实际操作之间的矛盾离不开司法解释的状况下,完善我国司法解释体制的一个较好的对策便是构建一元一级的司法解释体制,实行判例指导制度。本文认为完善我国的司法解释体制,构建判例指导制度在我国是必要的和可行的。构建判例指导制度既是改变大量抽象性的司法解释存在的需要,也是司法审判与法律解释不可分离性的需要；既是司法解释正当性证明的需要,也是提高法官适用法律时解释法律的质量和裁判效率的需要,同时,司法解释判例化又是具体解释的最佳手段。在我国构建判例指导制度具有可行性,既有历史基础也有现实基础。判例指导制度的建立在我国已经相对的成熟,并有一定的基础,所以建立判例指导制度势在必行。
[Abstract]:The legislature has legislative power, and the law is formulated by the legislature. The judiciary has the judicial power conferred by the Constitution, and it can only apply the law and has no right to make the law. When a specific case is tried by a judicial organ, the necessity of interpretation arises when the abstract law is applied. Judging from the development of the judicial interpretation system in China, the institution specializing in judicial interpretation has not yet developed in ancient China. However, judicial interpretation also plays an important role. The current judicial interpretation system in China has developed under certain historical conditions. There is no doubt that the current judicial interpretation and statutory law play a complementary role in our country. However, with the continuous improvement of our legislation, the judicial interpretation model formed under the specific historical conditions has been unable to meet the requirements of the modernization of the rule of law. There are some problems in the current judicial interpretation of our country, such as confusion of interpretation subject, law, contradiction of the effectiveness of inspection interpretation, etc. In the current social transition period, a large number of laws and regulations are issued, and the contradiction between legislation and actual operation cannot be separated from judicial interpretation. A better countermeasure to perfect the judicial interpretation system of our country is to construct the monolithic judicial interpretation system and carry out the system of judicial precedent guidance. This paper holds that it is necessary and feasible to perfect the judicial interpretation system of our country and to construct the guiding system of case law, which is the need of changing a large number of abstract judicial interpretations. It is also the need of the inseparability of judicial trial and legal interpretation, the need of proof of legitimacy of judicial interpretation, and the need to improve the quality of interpretation of law and the efficiency of adjudication when the judge applies the law, at the same time, The judicial interpretation precedent is the best means of concrete interpretation. It is feasible to construct the precedent guidance system in our country, which has both historical and realistic foundation. The establishment of the precedent guidance system has been relatively mature in our country and has a certain basis. Therefore, it is imperative to establish the system of precedent guidance.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D920.4

【参考文献】