美国专利间接侵权主观要件评析

发布时间：2018-03-17 10:18

本文选题：美国专利法　切入点：专利间接侵权　出处：《知识产权》2017年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：专利间接侵权行为构成中的主观要件是侵权判定的关键部分,我国最新专利法司法解释和修订草案对此仅作出了笼统的规定,导致操作性存在不足,学界和司法实务也缺乏主流观点。上述问题会对我国专利间接侵权制度的实际效果造成消极影响。我国专利法规中的间接侵权条款以美国专利法为蓝本,而美国在主观要件方面的司法实践也最为丰富,具有相当的参考价值。借鉴美国经验,我国应将主观要件中的过错限定为故意,规定"明知"之对象包括知道专利存在和所促成之行为构成侵权等事实,并在探索"明知"的判断标准时更加注重客观行为因素的考量。
[Abstract]:The subjective elements in the constitution of patent indirect infringement act are the key part of infringement judgment. The latest patent law judicial interpretation and revision draft of our country only make general provisions, which lead to the deficiency of operation. There is also a lack of mainstream view in academic circles and judicial practice. The above problems will have a negative impact on the actual effect of the indirect patent infringement system in China. The indirect infringement clauses in our patent laws and regulations are based on the United States Patent Law. The judicial practice of the United States in subjective elements is also the most abundant, which has considerable reference value. Using the experience of the United States for reference, our country should limit the fault in the subjective elements to intentional. The object of "knowing" includes the fact that the patent exists and the act contributed to constitute infringement, and pays more attention to the consideration of objective behavior factor when exploring the criterion of "knowing".
【作者单位】：上海财经大学法学院;北京市顺义区人民法院;
【分类号】：D971.2;DD913

【相似文献】