论法律解释的证立

发布时间：2018-03-19 01:33

本文选题：法律论证　切入点：法律解释　出处：《中国政法大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着法典化神话的破灭,以及社会现状的不断变化,法律的不完善性被越来越多的学者所认识。在对具体案件进行审理的过程中,法官不能因为法律的不完善拒绝裁判,这便需要对法律做出解释,来获得裁判的大前提。然而,在众多疑难案件中,由于法律解释方法的可选择性和法律解释的主观性,法官能够寻找到的裁判大前提可能是多样的。但是要写进判决书中的裁判大前提必须是唯一的,所以法官需要完成一项很重要的任务——对他寻找到的裁判大前提进行证立,论证案件的裁判大前提是合理的。只有经过这个步骤,法官所选择的裁判大前提才有可能被公众所信服。由此可见,法律解释证立的问题有很大的研究价值。笔者试图对法律解释证立这个问题做出系统的研究。本文共分为六个部分。文章首先介绍了法律解释证立问题的研究现状以及研究的重要意义。指出:法律解释的证立是判决得以证立的必要条件,是法律论证理论的重要组成部分,对这个问题进行专门研究有很强的理论意义与实践意义。第二部分通过“法律解释证立”与“法律解释”,“法律解释证立”与“法律判决证成”两组概念的辨析,明确“法律解释证立”的内涵和外延。文章第三部分提出了法律解释证立应当遵循的准则:合理性。在合理性的框架下,笔者指出,法律解释要得到很好的证立,须要遵循:一致性、融贯性、可接受性三种子准则。在第四部分,文章从实证的角度论述了法律解释证立的三种基本方法:逻辑的方法、修辞的方法以及对话的方法。文章第五部分详细阐述了法律解释证立的依据及其适用,即:语义学论述、目的论述、类推结果论述、法教义学论述四种解释证立的依据和它们在司法实践中如何适用。文章最后一部分紧密结合中国的司法实践,指出:在我国的司法实践中,法律解释的证立存在诸多的问题。同时,提出了几条相关的建议,以期对问题加以解决。
[Abstract]:With the collapse of the legalized myth and the constant change of the social situation, the imperfection of the law has been recognized by more and more scholars. In the process of hearing the specific cases, the judge can not refuse to judge because the law is imperfect. In many difficult cases, however, due to the selectivity of the legal interpretation method and the subjectivity of the legal interpretation, The major premise that the judge can find may be diverse. But the premise of the decision to be written in the judgment must be the only one, so the judge needs to complete a very important task-to testify against the premise he is looking for. It is only through this step that the judge can possibly be convinced by the public. The author tries to make a systematic study on the problem of legal interpretation. This paper is divided into six parts. First of all, the paper introduces the research status and significance of the legal interpretation, and points out that the evidence of legal interpretation is the necessary condition for the judgment to be corroborated. Is an important part of the theory of legal argumentation, It is of great theoretical and practical significance to conduct a special study on this issue. The second part discriminates between the concepts of "legal interpretation and legal interpretation", "legal interpretation of evidence" and "legal judgment". In the third part of the article, the author points out that the legal interpretation should be well documented under the framework of reasonableness, which should be followed in the third part of the article. In the 4th part, the article discusses three basic methods of legal interpretation from the perspective of demonstration: logical method, logical method, and the following three basic principles: consistency, consistency, acceptability, etc. In the 4th part, the article discusses three basic methods of legal interpretation: logical method, logical method, and so on. Part 5th elaborates the basis and application of legal interpretation, I. E. semantics, purpose, analogies, and so on. In the last part of the article, it is pointed out that in the judicial practice of our country, it is closely combined with the judicial practice in China, and points out that in the judicial practice of our country, There are many problems in legal interpretation. At the same time, some suggestions are put forward to solve the problem.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90

【相似文献】