当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

我国父母监护权撤销制度的法社会学研究

发布时间:2018-03-21 08:08

  本文选题:未成年人 切入点:父母监护权 出处:《重庆工商大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:父母监护权撤销制度是针对未成年人父母或父或母在不履行监护职责,或是损害未成人的合法权益时,经有关人员或单位的申请,由法院撤销其父母的监护权的一种制度。虽然我国早已在相关法律中规定了这一制度,但在我国的司法实践中几乎无人问津。近年来,社会上频频爆出父母虐待未成年人的事件,引发了全社会的广泛讨论。为了更好地维护未成年人的合法权利,最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、民政部联合发布《关于依法处理监护人侵害未成年人权益行为若干问题的意见》,专门指导有关部门处理监护侵害案件。该意见已经在我国投入实践有2年多的时间,对我国的未成年人权益的保护起到了重要的作用。但与此同时,在实践中也暴露该制度的一些不足。本文采用法社会学的研究视角,将父母监护权撤销制度落在社会的实践中,发现其运用中存在问题,并通过对相关案例的回顾分析,发现就我国目前的实际操作中,父母监护权撤销制度在其运行的四个环节中都有着不同的难题,表现在发现时,传统文化思想的固有观念导致人们普遍缺乏保护未成年人监护权益的意识;审理时,在立法层面缺乏细致全面的法律规定让父母监护权撤销制度做到有法可依;安置时缺乏专业的未成年人保护体系确保未成年人能够得到全面的照料;最后在监督问题上,未建立统一的国家监护监督制度从而致使未成年人的新生活缺乏保证。为了使我国父母监护权制度撤销中存在的问题得到有效的解决,笔者建议从以下几点出发,完善我国的父母监护权撤销制度:第一,进行保护未成年人权益的思想普及,转变民众的传统思想,提高人民保护未成年人权益的法律意识;第二,对父母监护权撤销制度进行制度完善,通过补充父母监护权撤销制度的相关原则、扩大申请人的主体资格范围、将父母侵犯未成年人财产权益纳入撤销其监护资格的法定事由、严格把控提起恢复父母监护资格的标准等方面的制度完善;第三,在未成年人“安置”的环节中,国家进行宏观调控,指导有关部门落实具体制度;同时加快未成年人救助保护机构的建设,并激发社会组织活力,加强国家机关与社会团体合作来确保未成年人能够得到高质量的安置;最后,通过设立统一的国家监护监督制度以此来避免未成年人受到二次伤害。
[Abstract]:The system of revocation of parental custody is directed at the application of the person or unit concerned when the parent or parent of a minor fails to perform the duties of guardianship or impairs the legitimate rights and interests of the minor, A system whereby custody of his parents is annulled by the courts. Although this system has long been established in the relevant laws, it has hardly been followed in judicial practice in our country in recent years, In order to better safeguard the legal rights of minors, the Supreme people's Court, the Supreme people's Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, The Ministry of Civil Affairs has jointly issued the opinions on dealing with certain issues concerning the violation of the rights and interests of minors by guardians according to law, and has specifically instructed relevant departments to handle cases of guardianship violations. This opinion has been put into practice in China for more than two years. It has played an important role in the protection of the rights and interests of minors in our country, but at the same time, it has also exposed some shortcomings of the system in practice. It is found that there are some problems in its application, and through the review and analysis of relevant cases, it is found that in the actual operation of our country, there are different problems in the four links of the operation of the revocation system of parental custody, which is manifested in the discovery. The traditional cultural ideas lead to the general lack of consciousness of protecting the rights and interests of minors guardianship, the lack of detailed and comprehensive legal provisions in the legislative level to enable parents to revoke guardianship system to achieve a legal basis; The lack of a professional system for the protection of minors at the time of placement ensures that minors receive comprehensive care; finally, on the issue of supervision, In order to effectively solve the problems existing in the revocation of the parental custody system in China, the author suggests to proceed from the following points. To improve the revocation system of parental custody in China: first, to popularize the idea of protecting the rights and interests of minors, to change the traditional thinking of the public, and to raise the people's legal awareness of protecting the rights and interests of minors; second, To perfect the system of revocation of parental custody, to expand the scope of the subject qualification of the applicant by supplementing the relevant principles of the revocation system of parental custody, and to bring parents' infringement of the property rights and interests of minors into the statutory cause of revocation of their guardianship qualifications. Third, in the "placement" of minors, the state carries out macro-control to guide the relevant departments to implement the specific system; At the same time, we should speed up the construction of relief and protection institutions for minors, stimulate the vitality of social organizations, and strengthen the cooperation between state organs and social organizations to ensure that minors can be placed in high quality. Finally, Through the establishment of a unified national guardianship supervision system to avoid secondary injury to minors.
【学位授予单位】:重庆工商大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D90-052

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王夏;;论我国未成年人监护制度的完善——以相关判决为依据的分析[J];世纪桥;2016年08期

2 罗清;;美国终止父母权利制度述评[J];中华女子学院学报;2016年04期

3 杨立新;;《民法总则》制定与我国监护制度之完善[J];法学家;2016年01期

4 夏吟兰;;比较法视野下的“父母责任”[J];北方法学;2016年01期

5 佟丽华;;监护侵害处理意见:激活“沉睡的制度”[J];中国青年社会科学;2015年05期

6 孙跃;;论亲权的剥夺[J];北京化工大学学报(社会科学版);2015年01期

7 杨志超;;美国儿童保护强制报告制度及其对我国的启示[J];重庆社会科学;2014年07期

8 黄欣;兰岚;;我国未成年人监护制度的缺失及重构[J];探索与争鸣;2014年03期

9 王葆莳;;德国对父母照顾权的国家监督机制——南京两幼女被饿死事件引起的法律思考[J];青年探索;2014年01期

10 胡巧绒;;美国儿童虐待法律保护体系介绍及对我国的启示[J];青少年犯罪问题;2011年05期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 佟丽华;;未成年人权益保护机制亟待完善[N];法制日报;2002年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 罗杰;家庭暴力立法与实践研究[D];西南政法大学;2012年

相关硕士学位论文 前2条

1 徐涛;论针对儿童的家庭暴力防治体系的构建[D];南京大学;2013年

2 刘伟;亲权滥用法律问题研究[D];山东大学;2013年



本文编号:1642988

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1642988.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户67509***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com