中英司法大众化若干制度与实践之比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-21 08:43

  本文选题：司法大众化　切入点：司法职业化　出处：《天津商业大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：研究司法大众化可以从职业维度与政治维度两种视角进行,职业维度说得是司法从业者来自于普通民众,而政治维度说得是掌握中央权力的社会阶层,通过让民众参与其司法过程,将它希望的社会秩序落实于其它社会阶层的过程。职业维度是司法大众化的表象,政治维度才是司法大众化的本质。并且,司法大众化具有“参与”和“救济”两个层面的内含。我国和英国都广泛存在司法大众化现象,其中典型的有陪审制度与“三刺之法”,治安法官制度与乡—里“司法”。司法大众化在两国的表现不同,效果不同,这种不同可以从三个方面进行解释。一是司法大众化的主观诉求,二是司法大众化的客观必要性,三是司法大众化的可行性。近现代,两国历史上的司法大众化的典型制度都受到不同程度地影响,英国较好地处理了司法大众化与司法职业化的关系,淡化司法大众化中的参与成分,转而强调司法大众化的救济成分。我国也进行过几次司法大众化与司法职业化的取舍实践,屡屡遇到困难。只要政治诉求尚存,司法大众化就有其存在的意义。司法大众化与司法职业化不存在必然的冲突,单一的大众化与职业化在我国都行不通。我国应当在实践司法大众化的同时,坚持走司法职业化道路,应当更多地强调司法大众化中的实质性救济。
[Abstract]:The study of judicial popularization can be carried out from two perspectives: the professional dimension and the political dimension. The professional dimension is that the judicial practitioners come from the ordinary people, and the political dimension is the social stratum that holds the central power. By involving the public in its judicial process, the social order it hopes for is implemented in the process of other social strata. The professional dimension is the representation of judicial popularization, and the political dimension is the essence of judicial popularization. Judicial popularization has two aspects: "participation" and "relief". The phenomenon of judicial popularization exists widely in China and Britain. Typical of them are the jury system and the "law of three thorns", the system of magistrates and the "justice of justice" in the township. The judicial popularization is different in the two countries and the effect is different. This difference can be explained from three aspects. One is the subjective appeal of judicial popularization, the other is the objective necessity of judicial popularization, and the third is the feasibility of judicial popularization. The typical system of judicial popularization in the history of the two countries has been affected to varying degrees. Britain has handled the relationship between judicial popularization and judicial professionalization and played down the participation in judicial popularization. Instead of emphasizing the relief elements of judicial popularization, our country has also carried out several times of judicial popularization and judicial professionalization practice, often encountered difficulties, as long as the political appeal remains, Judicial popularization has its own significance. There is no inevitable conflict between judicial popularization and judicial professionalization. Sticking to the road of judicial professionalization should emphasize more substantial relief in judicial popularization.
【学位授予单位】：天津商业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926;D956.1

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前10条

1 郭爱民;;中世纪英国多元权力社会结构与间接民主起源[J];北方论丛;2007年04期

2 屈文生;;试论普通法令状的起源及其嬗变[J];东方法学;2009年05期

3 顾荣新;;12世纪～19世纪英国治安法官的起源与流变[J];法律文化研究;2007年00期

4 沈德咏;;司法大众化的理论基础[J];法制资讯;2009年01期

5 程汉大;12—13世纪英国法律制度的革命性变化[J];世界历史;2000年05期

6 陈日华;;中古英格兰的教区行政[J];世界历史;2007年01期

7 何兵;司法职业化与民主化[J];法学研究;2005年04期

8 侯欣一;;陕甘宁边区司法制度的大众化特点[J];法学研究;2007年04期

9 王敏远;中国陪审制度及其完善[J];法学研究;1999年04期

10 程远宏;;论明清乡族势力对经济发展的阻碍作用[J];荆州师专学报;1991年04期

中国博士学位论文全文数据库 前1条

1 曹永军;陪审制度变革的历史成因[D];吉林大学;2007年

中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前1条

1 陆娓;明清乡里调解制度研究[D];南京师范大学;2007年

，

本文编号：1643098