权利本位论的逻辑考量

发布时间：2018-03-21 15:28

本文选题：权利本位论　切入点：法本位　出处：《广西大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在改革开放的时代背景下,为了纠正长期以来“以阶级斗争为纲”的法学路线,上世纪八十年代末、九十年代初法学理论界围绕着“法本位”问题展开激烈的争论。其中权利本位论论者主张以“权利”作为法的本位赢得了众多的支持者,他们认为法以(应当以)“权利”为其起点,轴心或重心,权利本位范式为法学提供了理解系统、重构工具、理论框架,应当根据权利本位论重构中国法学。学术界众多法学家纷纷对此进行了质疑和批判,并形成了一系列有价值的学术理论。纵观国际法学理论研究,西方法学界同样针对西方当下的“权利话语”进行了质疑和批判。故此,为了梳理权利本位论的逻辑脉络,笔者通过研究权利本位论提出的背景、权利本位论的主要观点、以及当代中西法学理论界对权利本位论的质疑与批判,进而对权利本位论进行了再次探讨,并尝试提出一条探视性的路径。
[Abstract]:In the background of the reform and opening up, in order to correct the "class struggle" line of law for a long time, at the end of -20s, In 90s, the academic circle of law launched a fierce debate around the issue of "law standard", in which the right-based theorists advocated "right" as the standard of law, which won many supporters. They think that law should take "right" as its starting point, axis or center of gravity, and the right-based paradigm provides a system of understanding, a tool for reconstruction, a theoretical framework for law. Chinese jurisprudence should be reconstructed according to the theory of right standard. Many jurists in academic circles have questioned and criticized it one after another, and formed a series of valuable academic theories. Therefore, in order to sort out the logic of the right standard theory, the author studies the background of the right standard theory and the main viewpoints of the right standard theory by studying the background of the right standard theory and the main point of view of the right standard theory. In addition, the contemporary Chinese and Western legal theorists question and criticize the theory of right standard, and then probe into the theory of right standard again, and try to put forward a visitation path.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】