中韩破产法制度的特征比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-22 02:30

本文选题：中国企业破产法　切入点：韩国破产法　出处：《南京大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在2006年,《中华人民共和国企业破产法》与通过数次的修订过程而制定的韩国《统合破产法》都相继被制定和实施。按照两国的经济情况和世界潮流被修订的两国破产法,对两国而言,是意义重大的一种变化。本文整体上分析了中国《企业破产法》和韩国《统合破产法》的特征,以两国的法律条文为主进行制度比较。正文共分为七个部分。第一章讨论了破产法的目的和在当代社会中破产制度的意义及其必要性。破产有两种破产形式,一是清算型破产,另一是回生型破产。大部分人一听‘破产’这词,一般想起来的是传统的清算型破产,就认为破产是一个清算整理公司的程序之一。因此,本文说明给债务人、债权人都有帮助的回生型破产‘重整制度’的意义和破产制度的根本目的。第二章讨论中韩两国的破产制度体系的根源。中国的‘社会主义市场经济’体制和韩国面临过的‘世界金融危机’等特殊情况影响了两国的破产制度的修订。通过中韩两国的破产制度沿革,比较两国的经济情况和立法思想,进行分析法律构成、适用范围等两国破产法制度的体系和其主要特征。第三章主要讨论的是破产制度的核心组织--“破产管理机构”。本文通过比较研究,指出两国均采用破产管理机构的代表性机构‘管理人制度’和代表债权人利益的‘债权人会议制度’。而且,按照两国的国情,还运营‘债权人委员会(中国)’、‘管理委员会和调查委员(韩国)’。本章还讨论了这些破产管理机构的角色和其必要性。第四章讨论了回生型破产的代表制度‘重整程序制度’。首先说明了重整程序制度的意义和其必要性和两国重整程序制度的进行过程。而且,通过两国有关法律条文,进行分析了两国的重整制度上的特征。第五章比较说明了破产程序中和解程序制度。本文指出,中国《企业破产法》的特征之一是重整程序、和解程序、破产清算程序都被连接,进行破产程序。但为了防止因和解制度的恶用而引起的负面影响,制定韩国《统合破产法》时,废止了曾有的和解法。本章说明了其废止原因,分析了中国和解制度的特征。第六章讨论了传统的破产形式‘破产清算程序制度’。通过有关法律条文,进行比较中韩两国破产清算程序的过程和其主要特征,同时讨论了破产清算程序的终点站‘破产程序的终结’。结语部分对中韩两国破产制度进行了整体性比较,并提出了两国需要改善的部分。
[Abstract]:In 2006, both the Enterprise bankruptcy Law of the people's Republic of China and the Korean Unified bankruptcy Law, formulated through several revisions, were formulated and implemented. It is a significant change for the two countries. This paper analyzes the characteristics of China's Enterprise bankruptcy Law and Korea's Unified bankruptcy Law, and compares the two countries' legal provisions. The text is divided into seven parts. The first chapter discusses the purpose of insolvency law and the significance and necessity of bankruptcy system in contemporary society. There are two forms of bankruptcy: liquidation bankruptcy and reincarnation bankruptcy. Most people hear the word 'bankruptcy'. Generally speaking, we think of bankruptcy as one of the procedures of a liquidation company. Creditors are helpful to the meaning of the reincarnation bankruptcy 'reorganization system' and the fundamental purpose of the bankruptcy system. The second chapter discusses the root of the bankruptcy system of China and South Korea. The 'socialist market economy' system in China and the 'world financial crisis' faced by South Korea have affected the revision of the bankruptcy system of the two countries. Through the evolution of the bankruptcy system of China and South Korea, This paper compares the economic situation and legislative thought of the two countries and analyzes the legal constitution and the scope of application of the bankruptcy law system of the two countries and its main characteristics. The third chapter mainly discusses the core organization of the bankruptcy system-"the bankruptcy Administration". Noting that both countries use the 'administrator' system, the representative body of the insolvency administration, and the 'creditors' meeting system, which represents the interests of creditors, and that, in the light of the national conditions of the two countries, It also operates the 'creditor committee' management committee and investigating committee (Korea). This chapter also discusses the role of these insolvency authorities and their necessity. The fourth chapter discusses the representative system of reincarnation bankruptcy 'reorganization procedure system. Firstly, it explains the significance and necessity of the reorganization procedure system and the process of carrying out the reorganization procedure system of the two countries. Moreover, through the relevant legal provisions of the two countries, The characteristics of the reorganization system of the two countries are analyzed. Chapter five compares and explains the settlement procedure system in bankruptcy proceedings. This paper points out that one of the characteristics of China's Enterprise bankruptcy Law is that the reorganization procedure, the settlement procedure, and the bankruptcy liquidation procedure are all connected. But in order to prevent the negative influence caused by the evil use of the settlement system, the former conciliatory law was abolished when the Korean uniform bankruptcy Law was formulated. This chapter explains the reasons for its abolishment and analyzes the characteristics of the Chinese settlement system. The sixth chapter discusses the traditional bankruptcy form, the bankruptcy liquidation procedure system. Through the relevant legal provisions, it compares the process and the main characteristics of the bankruptcy liquidation procedure between China and South Korea. At the same time, the termination of bankruptcy proceedings is discussed. The conclusion part compares the bankruptcy system of China and South Korea, and points out the parts that need to be improved.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.291.92;D931.26

【参考文献】