当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法理论文 >

“自诬服”的司法逻辑及现代反思

发布时间:2018-04-04 17:20

  本文选题:自诬服 切入点:刑讯 出处:《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:“自诬服”是存在于我国古代的一种司法现象,彰显着我国古代审结案件的某些特点。对此类司法现象进行证据、诉讼制度、法官责任、律令规定等诸多方面的深入分析,可以丰富法律史研究,特别是对当今司法审判具有较高的借鉴反思价值。“自诬服”现象反映出冤案形成的过程和冤案平反结果。近年来,我国司法实践中也频发冤假错案,这些冤假错案给当事人造成了物质精神上的重大损失,也极大地损害了国家的司法权威,阻碍了我国法治建设的进程,也引起了较大的社会关注。对我国古代“自诬服”现象进行研究,可以帮助我们更好地分析冤假错案的形成原因,从中汲取经验教训。论文梳理了我国古代“自诬服”司法现象,与疑案进行对比分析。对“自诬服”的原因进行了分析,认为我国古代适用有罪推定原则,采用刑讯制度,司法权的从属化以及口供中心主义是造成“自诬服”的主要原因。通过梳理古代的司法制度与措施,指出中国古代对“自诬服”现象采取一系列避免措施和纠正程序。通过对“自诬服”现象司法逻辑的总结,结合现代冤假错案,提炼一些可资借鉴的因素,从中获得启示。通过对“自诬服”案例的研究,得出关于这类案件的理论依据,并把理论与实践相结合,把对“自诬服”现象的逻辑总结与分析运用到实践中来,理论联系实际,并且更好的运用于现代案例中,使之推动案件的发展,减少错误案件的产生。
[Abstract]:"self-false conviction" is a kind of judicial phenomenon in ancient China, which shows some characteristics of Chinese ancient cases.The in-depth analysis of such judicial phenomena, such as evidence, litigation system, judge's responsibility, law and order and so on, can enrich the study of the history of law, especially has a higher value of reference and reflection to the judicial trial today.The phenomenon of self-falsehood reflects the process of the formation of injustice and the result of redress.In recent years, the judicial practice of our country has also frequently resulted in false and wrong cases, which have caused material and spiritual losses to the parties, and have greatly damaged the judicial authority of the state and hindered the process of the construction of the rule of law in our country.It has also aroused greater social concern.The study of the phenomenon of "false conviction" in ancient China can help us to better analyze the reasons for the formation of unjust false and wrong cases and draw lessons from them.This paper combs the judicial phenomenon of "self-false conviction" in ancient China and makes a comparative analysis with suspected cases.This paper analyzes the reasons of "false conviction", and holds that the principle of presumption of guilt in ancient China, the system of torture, the subordination of judicial power and the doctrine of confession centralism are the main causes of "falsehood".By combing the ancient judicial system and measures, this paper points out that ancient China took a series of measures to avoid and correct the phenomenon of "false conviction".By summing up the judicial logic of the phenomenon of "false conviction" and combining with the modern case of false and false, we can extract some factors that can be used for reference and get enlightenment from it.Through the study of the case of "false conviction", the theoretical basis of this kind of case is obtained, and the theory and practice are combined, the logic summary and analysis of the phenomenon of "falsely false conviction" is applied to practice, and the theory is combined with practice.And better used in modern cases, to promote the development of cases, reduce the emergence of false cases.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D90-051

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 霍存福;;宋代“鞫谳分司”:“听”“断”合一与分立的体制机制考察[J];社会科学辑刊;2016年06期

2 吴海航;;中国古代如何防止冤假错案的发生[J];人民论坛;2016年20期

3 杨东须;;论古代的刑讯逼供及对现代法治的启发[J];佳木斯职业学院学报;2016年04期

4 朱孝清;;冤假错案的原因和对策[J];中国刑事法杂志;2014年02期

5 田也异;;宋代法官错案追究制的再审视——兼评我国现行错案追究制[J];研究生法学;2014年02期

6 杨兴培;;历史上冤假错案是怎样酿成的[J];检察风云;2014年06期

7 柳正权;;中国古代定罪原则的法文化分析[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年06期

8 祖伟;;中国古代证据法文化透视——以语词“供”“证”为中心[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年04期

9 祖伟;;中国古代“据众证定罪”证据规则论[J];当代法学;2012年01期

10 欧阳本祺;;论我国定罪思维的传统及其演化[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2010年03期



本文编号:1710920

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1710920.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e984b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com