罗尔斯程序正义论

发布时间：2018-04-09 03:18

本文选题：罗尔斯　切入点：正义论　出处：《山东大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文主要以罗尔斯的《正义论》为研究对象,旨在梳理和探讨其中罗尔斯的程序正义论。罗尔斯在《正义论》中,有关程序正义最直接的内容,是将程序正义分为纯粹的程序正义、完善的程序正义、不完善的程序正义三类,程序正义的论述更多的是间接体现在以纯粹的程序正义为核心的程序正义的证明与运用过程中。本文以罗尔斯从对程序正义直接和间接论述的两个方面来分析罗尔斯的程序正义,并分析罗尔斯纯粹的程序正义设计以及所体现的程序本身的内在价值——程序正义。本文共分为三部分,第一部分：罗尔斯程序正义论形成的背景及渊源。为了更好的探讨罗尔斯程序正义论的内容,本部分从横纵两个纬度来说明罗尔斯程序正义论的形成。横向是罗尔斯提出程序正义的《正义论》产生的背景,包括罗尔斯正义思想形成的个人成长背景和罗尔斯所处社会的时代背景。纵向是罗尔斯程序正义论形成的历史渊源,包括英国的“自然正义”、美国的“正当法律程序”和欧洲大陆其他国家的程序正义观念三个方面。第二部分：罗尔斯程序正义论之分析。本部分主要系统的分析罗尔斯程序正义论的内容。以罗尔斯《正义论》到《政治自由主义》为主线,首先论述罗尔斯在《正义论》当中对程序正义的三种分类：纯粹的程序正义、完善的程序正义、不完善的程序正义,以及笔者对罗尔斯程序正义论之解读。其次论述罗尔斯在《政治自由主义》中对程序正义的修正,引入实体正义并提出重叠一致的概念。《正义论》中纯粹的程序正义是罗尔斯程序正义的核心,而罗尔斯的两个正义原则是《正义论》的核心和重点,是指导社会的基本结构建立的正义原则,“纯粹的程序正义是证成两个正义原则的渠道和方式”,接下来笔者将分析罗尔斯是如何通过设计纯粹的程序正义来论证两个正义原则是“迄今为止最好的正义原则”。最后笔者从价值的独立性、对人的尊重、普遍的结果认同三个方面来谈谈罗尔斯纯粹的程序正义所体现的程序正义价值。第三部分：罗尔斯程序正义论之评析。自罗尔斯发表《正义论》一书以来,有关程序正义的理论和学说不断出现,有对罗尔斯积极的回应,也有对罗尔斯强烈的批评和质疑。本部分首先论述罗尔斯程序正义论的理论意义,然后分析众多学者对罗尔斯程序正义论的质疑。罗尔斯对程序正义的论述不仅对英美法系产生了深远的影响,同时,也引领了大陆法系国家诸如法、德等国对程序正义问题的深入探讨,鉴于中国历来有重实体,轻程序的传统,最后笔者谈谈罗尔斯程序正义论对我国的几点借鉴意义。本文主要采用了历史分析、比较分析、法律解释等方法进行研究。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on Rawls' Theory of Justice, which aims to sort out and discuss Rawls' theory of procedural justice.In the Theory of Justice, Rawls divides procedural justice into three categories: pure procedural justice, perfect procedural justice and imperfect procedural justice.The discussion of procedural justice is indirectly reflected in the proof and application of procedural justice with pure procedural justice as its core.This paper analyzes Rawls' procedural justice from the two aspects of direct and indirect discussion of procedural justice, and analyzes Rawls' pure procedural justice design as well as the inherent value of the procedure itself-procedural justice.This paper is divided into three parts. The first part: the background and origin of Rawls' procedural justice theory.In order to better discuss the content of Rawls' procedural justice theory, this part explains the formation of Rawls' procedural justice theory from two latitudes.Horizontal is the background in which Rawls put forward the theory of procedural justice, including the background of personal growth of Rawls' thought of justice and the background of the era of Rawls' society.Vertical is the historical origin of Rawls' theory of procedural justice, including "natural justice" in Britain, "due process" in the United States and the concept of procedural justice in other countries in continental Europe.The second part: the analysis of Rawls' theory of procedural justice.This part systematically analyzes the content of Rawls' procedural justice theory.Taking Rawls' Theory of Justice to political Liberalism as the main line, this paper first discusses three kinds of classification of procedural justice in Rawls' Theory of Justice: pure procedural justice, perfect procedural justice, imperfect procedural justice.And the author's interpretation of Rawls's theory of procedural justice.Secondly, it discusses Rawls' revision of procedural justice in political liberalism, introduces substantive justice and puts forward the concept of overlapping consistency. The pure procedural justice in < Justice > is the core of Rawls' procedural justice.The two principles of justice of Rawls are the core and the focus of the theory of justice, and they are the principles of justice that guide the establishment of the basic structure of the society. "the pure procedural justice is the channel and the way to prove the two principles of justice".Then the author will analyze how Rawls designs pure procedural justice to prove that the two principles of justice are "the best principle of justice so far".Finally, the author discusses the value of procedural justice embodied by Rawls' pure procedural justice from three aspects: the independence of value, respect for human beings, and universal result identification.The third part: the analysis of Rawls' theory of procedural justice.Since Rawls published the Theory of Justice, the theories and theories of procedural justice have appeared constantly, there are positive responses to Rawls, and there are also strong criticisms and doubts against Rawls.This part first discusses the theoretical significance of Rawls' theory of procedural justice, and then analyzes many scholars' doubts about Rawls' theory of procedural justice.Rawls' exposition on procedural justice not only had a profound influence on the common law system, but also led countries such as law, Germany and other countries in the continental law system to probe deeply into the problem of procedural justice, in view of the fact that China has always attached great importance to the substance.In the end, the author talks about the reference meaning of Rawls' procedural justice theory to our country.This paper mainly adopts historical analysis, comparative analysis, legal interpretation and other methods to study.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】