法律信任的合理性探析
发布时间:2018-04-09 03:33
本文选题:法律信任 切入点:法的价值合理性 出处:《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:法律信任何以是可能的?在很大程度上,它需要由法律的价值合理性、法律的形式合理性以及法律在实际运行中的执行情况这三个因素来决定。这是本文探讨法律信任合理性的主线。 本文共分为四个部分。其中,第一部分是对法律信任构成与法律信任合理性的综述,后面三个部分则从三个角度分别对法律信任合理性要素进行具体阐释。第一部分主要是为了解决两个问题。其一,法律信任的内在构成应当如何剖析?这是后文进一步探析法律信任合理性的基础。其二,通过对法律信任内在构成的考察,得出了法律信任的三个合理性基础,即法律的价值合理性、法律的形式合理性和法律的强制力属性。 第二部分论述了法律正义与法律信任的密切关联。法律的生命力来源于它的正义属性,并且,只有当法律正义与社会正义相结合时,人们才会在心理上认同法律,从而接受法律。同时,我们也必须注意到,法律正义与社会正义的结合是有限的,因此必须以一种理性的态度来看待法律正义。 第三部分围绕形式理性法的合法性向度来论证法律信任的可能性。通过对韦伯法律形式合理性理论的考证,笔者进而得出传统法律形式合理性理论的局限性。而要克服这一合法性危机,只有借鉴程序主义法律范式的思想,通过建立法律共识来实现法律事实性与有效性的有机统一。惟其如此,人们忠诚于法律的信念才是稳固的。 第四部分研究了法律运行中的另一重要层面,即公民不服从问题。之所以要对之专章单独论述,是因为其有别于人们通常所理解的以法律强制力属性来催生法律信任的机理。公民不服从是以对法律的不服从为中心,然而它又是有限的不服从,其实质是基于法律正义的不服从。通过对公民不服从的正当性分析,我们可以认为公民不服从是培养法律信任的一种内生型的力量,它不但有利于法律的不断进步,而且能增进人们对法律的感情。
[Abstract]:How is legal trust possible?To a great extent, it needs to be determined by the value rationality of the law, the formal rationality of the law and the implementation of the law in practice.This is the main line of this article to discuss the rationality of legal trust.This paper is divided into four parts.The first part is a summary of the composition and rationality of legal trust, and the latter three parts explain the reasonable elements of legal trust from three angles.The first part is mainly to solve two problems.First, how to analyze the inner constitution of legal trust?This is the basis of the further analysis of the rationality of legal trust.Secondly, through the investigation of the inner constitution of legal trust, three rational bases of legal trust are obtained, that is, the rationality of legal value, the rationality of form of law and the attribute of compulsory force of law.The second part discusses the close relationship between legal justice and legal trust.The vitality of law comes from its nature of justice, and only when legal justice and social justice are combined, can people accept the law psychologically.At the same time, we must also notice that the combination of legal justice and social justice is limited, so we must treat legal justice with a rational attitude.The third part demonstrates the possibility of legal trust around the legitimacy of formal rational law.Based on the textual research of Weber's theory of legal form rationality, the author draws the limitation of traditional theory of legal form rationality.In order to overcome this legitimacy crisis, we can only use the thought of procedural legal paradigm for reference and realize the organic unity of legal fact and validity through establishing legal consensus.Only in this way, people's faith in the law is solid.The fourth part studies another important aspect in the operation of law, that is, citizen's disobedience.The reason why it should be discussed separately is that it is different from the common understanding of the mechanism of giving birth to legal trust by the attribute of legal compulsion.Civil disobedience is centered on the disobedience to the law, but it is limited, and its essence is based on the legal justice.Through the analysis of the legitimacy of citizen disobedience, we can think that citizen disobedience is an endogenous force to cultivate legal trust, which is not only conducive to the continuous progress of law, but also can enhance people's feelings towards law.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D90
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 马新福;杨清望;;法律信任初论[J];河北法学;2006年08期
2 胡启忠;;法律正义与法律价值之关系辨正[J];河北法学;2010年03期
3 唐涛;哈贝马斯对韦伯形式主义法律观的批判与超越[J];江苏科技大学学报(社会科学版);2005年01期
4 任满军;;法律正义的理性视角[J];时代法学;2006年01期
5 马长山;哈贝马斯的交往理性法律观及其启示[J];江苏社会科学;2002年04期
6 刘雪梅;;公民的道德权利是否可能?——当代政治哲学有关公民不服从基本问题之争论[J];江苏社会科学;2007年05期
7 吕建高;;论公民不服从的形式特征[J];理论界;2009年03期
8 岳th,田海平;信任研究的学术理路——对信任研究的若干路径的考查[J];南京社会科学;2004年06期
9 吕建高;;论公民不服从的正当性标准[J];南京社会科学;2009年09期
10 周旺生;论作为高层次伦理规范的正义[J];法学论坛;2003年04期
,本文编号:1724681
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/1724681.html