话语逆袭:当代中国的法律秩序

发布时间：2018-04-10 18:56

本文选题：道德话语 + 政治话语　；参考：《探索与争鸣》2016年11期

【摘要】：借用"话语"这一概念,道德话语、政治话语、法律话语可定义为当代中国纠纷解决的三种主要话语。在社会转型期,以"缠讼"与"涉诉信访"的实证研究为例,三种话语在纠纷解决的"官方表达"与"日常实践"两种情境中表现出"应然"与"实然"之间的"关系错位",政治话语、道德话语往往会"逆袭"至法律话语之上进行定纷止争,导致了大量"非法治现象"的出现。"话语逆袭",不仅是大众主义与精英主义两种对立的法治建设理念的产物,更是国家政权建设与现代法治建设之间不对等权力关系的表征。站在民族国家历史、文化、政治发展的角度理性审视这种现象,突破"规范式的西方中心主义",在文化自觉的基础上探寻"道德话语"、"政治话语"、"法律话语"之间的关系协同与权威配置,是探索"中国式法治"建设道路的关键所在。
[Abstract]:Using the concept of "discourse", moral discourse, political discourse and legal discourse can be defined as the three main discourses of dispute resolution in contemporary China.In the period of social transformation, the empirical study of "litigation" and "complaint petition" is taken as an example.In the two situations of "official expression" and "daily practice" of dispute resolution, the three kinds of discourse show "relationship dislocation" between "ought" and "reality", and political discourse.Moral discourse often "counterattacks" to the legal discourse to resolve disputes, resulting in a large number of "non-rule of law phenomenon.""discourse counterattack" is not only the product of the two opposing ideas of populism and elitist, but also the representation of the unequal power relationship between the construction of state power and the construction of modern rule of law.From the perspective of the history, culture, and political development of nation-states, we should examine this phenomenon rationally.The key to explore the construction of "Chinese rule of law" is to break through the "normative western centrism" and explore the relationship between "moral discourse", "political discourse" and "legal discourse" on the basis of cultural consciousness.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学社会发展学院;华东政法大学社会管理综合治理研究院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金资助项目“转型中国公立医院医患纠纷及其治理机制研究”(2016M591635)
【分类号】：D90-052

【相似文献】