中美两国土地征收补偿比较与借鉴

发布时间：2018-04-14 14:08

本文选题：总体收入法 + 重置资本法　；参考：《中州学刊》2014年09期

【摘要】：中美两国征地补偿都以保障人民合法财产为理论基础。在美国,尽管征地实践中存在不予补偿的非经济损失,但因补偿对象、标准、方式、支付期限等比较明确合理,所以基本上没有补偿纠纷。我国现行立法没有明确被征地农民是直接受补偿的被征收人,补偿标准、补偿费支付期限等方面的法律规定也含糊不清,这在一定程度上导致实践中被征地农民利益受损现象严重,征补双方矛盾、冲突多发。我国应借鉴美国的征地补偿经验,明确被征地农民为被征收人,对被征地农民蒙受的损失给予合理、甚至大于被征地价值的财产性补偿,采用总体收入和重置资本法来计算土地价值,补偿费由征补双方协商确定后及时到位,增加土地互换等补偿方式,征补纠纷由法院裁决。
[Abstract]:Both Chinese and American land expropriation compensation is based on the protection of the legitimate property of the people.In the United States, although there are non-economic losses that are not compensated in land expropriation practice, there is basically no compensation dispute because of the clear and reasonable compensation objects, standards, methods and payment periods.The current legislation of our country does not make it clear that the peasants who have been expropriated are directly compensated, and the legal provisions on compensation standards and the payment period of compensation fees are also ambiguous.To a certain extent, this leads to serious damage to the interests of farmers who have been requisitioned for land in practice, and conflicts between the two sides are frequent.Our country should draw lessons from the experience of land expropriation in the United States, make clear that the peasants who have been expropriated are the expropriated people, and give reasonable compensation to the peasants who have been expropriated for their losses, or even more property compensation than the value of the land requisitioned.The total income and the replacement capital method are adopted to calculate the land value, the compensation fee is determined by both the levy and supplement parties, and the compensation methods such as land exchange are added, and the dispute of expropriation and compensation is decided by the court.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学经济法学院;英国华威大学商学院;
【基金】：2013年国家社会科学基金项目《农村土地“三权”抵押融资窘境及改革措施研究》(13BFX107)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.3;D971.2

【参考文献】