美国传染病强制医疗制度及启示

发布时间：2018-04-14 14:18

本文选题：Speaker案 + Daniels案　；参考：《比较法研究》2014年06期

【摘要】：美国Speaker案和Daniels案,揭示了为防治传染病而频繁使用的强制医疗控制措施,却屡次伤害和侵袭公民个体的权利和自由的现实。实体法必须对自由进行限制,但其正当性还应得到程序性规则之检视。两起事件暴露出美国传染病防治中出现的立法及法律实施问题,在强制医疗过程中完善保障患者权利的规则、明确法院审查原则和审查标准以提高审判智慧方面,为我们提供了经验和借鉴。
[Abstract]:The cases of Speaker and Daniels in the United States reveal the reality of the frequent use of compulsory medical control measures for the prevention and control of infectious diseases, while repeatedly harming and attacking the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.Substantive law must restrict freedom, but its legitimacy should be examined by procedural rules.The two incidents exposed the problems of legislation and law enforcement in the prevention and control of infectious diseases in the United States. In the process of compulsory medical treatment, they improved the rules to protect the rights of patients and clarified the principles and standards of court review in order to enhance the wisdom of the trial.For us to provide experience and reference.
【作者单位】：南方医科大学人文与管理学院法学系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年课题“强制医疗法律关系研究”(10YJC820054)的研究成果广州市城乡公共卫生服务体系建设研究基地研究成果
【分类号】：D971.2

【相似文献】