“五听之讼”的借鉴及当代运用

发布时间：2018-04-16 12:29

本文选题：五听之讼 + 自由心证　；参考：《苏州大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：民事诉讼中,民众选择司法途径来解决自己遇到的纷争是因为人们相信司法的公正性,相信法官是权威的、是正义的。人们希望法官断案是根据客观的真实的事实做出相应裁断。而在我国由于很多年来对程序的看重,很多法官往往更追求程序正义,把程序正义放在首要位置,导致司法定纷止争的作用减退。在中国古代,法官在审判时很多情况下会使用“五听”审判技巧,对“两造”即原、被告或证人等进行辞听、色听、气听、耳听、目听,观察清楚当事人的陈述是否符合逻辑,原因是否合理,神情是否自然,喘气是否急促,精神是否恍惚,目光是否暗淡,根据多种因素来判断案情,在内心形成确信,最后做出完美的、公正的、信服的裁断。“五听”制度往往同自由心证、事实推定、经验法则、心理学联系在一起,故在理论上有其存在的根据。“五听之讼”在古代的审判中发挥了极大的作用,价值言多不过。本文试从当代民事诉讼的角度来出发,对“五听之讼”提出一些深入的思考,并就如何运用和完善进行分析。
[Abstract]:In civil litigation, people choose judicial approach to solve their disputes because they believe in the fairness of the judiciary, believe that judges are authoritative and just.It is hoped that the judge will judge the case according to the objective and true facts.In our country due to the importance of the procedure for many years many judges tend to pursue procedural justice and put procedural justice in the first place leading to the decline of the role of judicial settlement dispute.In ancient China, in many cases, judges used the "five listening" trial techniques to listen to the "two things", that is, the original, the accused or the witness, to listen, to listen, to listen, to hear, to see and to see if the statements made by the parties were logical.Whether the reason is reasonable, whether the expression is natural, whether the gasp is quick, whether the spirit is trance, whether the vision is dim, according to many factors to judge the case, form the conviction in the heart, and finally make the perfect, fair, convincing judgment.The system of "five listening" is often associated with free testimony, presumption of facts, rules of experience and psychology, so there is a theoretical basis for its existence.The five hearings played a great role in the ancient trial.From the angle of contemporary civil action, this paper puts forward some deep thoughts on "the lawsuit of five listening", and analyzes how to use and perfect it.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D929;D925.1

【相似文献】