法律道德主义适用于微小违法行为治理的可能与限度

发布时间：2018-04-19 10:53

本文选题：微小违法行为 + 法律道德主义　；参考：《重庆社会科学》2017年08期

【摘要】：法与道德关系是法理学的元命题,关于微小违法行为的规制路径便镶嵌其中。此类行为是一种违反公共道德、侵犯公共利益的微小过错行为,在陌生人社会的具体场景里,当前过于柔和、松散的法规范难以有效因应。通过对法律道德主义的还原与激活,从治理1.0向2.0迭代,能够以法律形式对不道德行为进行强制,所体现的硬度与密度在规范性层面能够对微小违法行为的治理产生实效。在法治政府主导下的推进国家治理能力现代化和治理体系现代化的大背景之下,法律道德主义的适用还应当保持与法律父爱主义的距离,在私人道德与公共道德、公共利益与公民权利之间,保持必要的合理性限度。
[Abstract]:The relationship between law and morality is the meta-proposition of jurisprudence, and the regulation path of minor illegal acts is embedded in it.This kind of behavior is a kind of minor fault that violates public morality and public interest. In the concrete scene of stranger society, it is too soft at present, and the loose legal norm is difficult to deal with effectively.Through the reduction and activation of legal moralism, from governance 1.0 to 2.0 iteration, the immoral behavior can be enforced in the form of law, and the hardness and density reflected in the normative level can produce actual effects on the governance of minor illegal acts.Under the background of promoting the modernization of national governance capacity and governance system under the guidance of the government ruled by law, the application of legal moralism should maintain the distance from legal fatherhood, in private morality and public morality.Between the public interest and the civil rights, maintain the necessary reasonable limit.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学研究生教育院;华东政法大学法律学院;
【基金】：2017年度浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题项目“论认知风格对法官决策差异形成的影响”(批准号:17NDJC195YB) 2017年度华东政法大学博士研究生第七期海外调研资助项目
【分类号】：D90-052

【相似文献】