真假学术批评的含义及展开——从《法学学术规范与方法论研究》谈起

发布时间：2018-04-19 11:53

本文选题：学术批评 + 法学学术规范　；参考：《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：在利益纠葛面前,当下的学术批评迷失了应有的方向。把握学术批评的方向应从寻找学术批评的真谛出发,由此可以划定"真学术批评"与"假学术批评"之间的界限。"真学术批评"是从帮助对方发现真理的动机出发,遵循以逻辑、价值和情理的正当与否为标准,采取温和的、建设性的批评方式,在共同的语境和学术共同体内部进行的学术交流活动。与之相反的则是"假学术批评"。为了开展"真学术批评",学者要拒绝外部社会对学术共同体内部争议的干预,要尊重对方的人格、学格和真理发现能力,拒绝简单粗暴和片面主观的做法;高校要恰当地、合理地利用学术管理权力并将之与行政管理权力区分开来;国家要实现"政学分途";媒体要发挥对学术失范及学术批评的监督作用。为了揭批"假学术批评",要建立一个独立自主、有着健全的学术争议处理机制的学术共同体,培育一批从事"真学术批评"和揭批"假学术批评"的批评家,树立学术批评不仅是批评"假学术批评"而且还批评"真学术批评"的观念。
[Abstract]:In the face of interest disputes, the current academic criticism lost its due direction.In order to grasp the direction of academic criticism, we should look for the true meaning of academic criticism and draw the boundary between "true academic criticism" and "false academic criticism". "True academic criticism "is based on the motivation to help the other party discover the truth, follows the criterion of logic, value and reasonableness, and adopts a moderate and constructive way of criticism."Academic exchanges within the common context and academic community.The opposite is false academic criticism.In order to carry out the "true academic criticism," scholars should reject the interference of the outside society in the disputes within the academic community, respect the personality of the other side, learn the truth and the ability to discover truth, reject the simple, rude and one-sided subjective approach, and appropriately,The power of academic management should be rationally utilized and distinguished from the power of administration; the state should realize the "political credit path"; and the media should play a supervisory role in academic anomie and academic criticism.In order to expose and criticize "false academic criticism," it is necessary to establish an independent academic community with a sound mechanism for handling academic disputes, and cultivate a number of critics engaged in "true academic criticism" and "false academic criticism."Setting up the idea that academic criticism is not only false academic criticism but also true academic criticism.
【作者单位】：东南大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学专项任务项目(“科研诚信和学风建设”)2011年重大课题“学术规范和学科方法论研究”(11JDXF001) 国家社会科学基金2011年重大项目“现代城市交通发展的制度平台与法律保障机制研究”(11&ZD160)
【分类号】：D90-5

【参考文献】