无冕之君与富强之具——从美国宪法的政治角色看中国宪法的法家背景

发布时间：2018-04-26 19:04

本文选题：法理学 + 美国宪法　；参考：《社会科学战线》2017年01期

【摘要】：从比较宪法学的角度看,美国宪法无论是在政治制度、政治过程还是在政治认同方面,与前现代国家的君主都具有很大的同构性与可比性。因而,美国宪法是"后君主制"背景的产物。20世纪初期出现的中国宪法虽然同样享有宪法之名,但是,中国宪法从诞生之时起,就承担了一个现实性、功利性的使命:救亡图存、实现富强。因而,中国宪法是作为实现国家富强的工具来期待的。中国宪法的这种角色,具有深厚的法家背景,是传统中国法家学说的产物,也是新战国时代的产物。从根本上说,法家学说就是对新战国格局的思想回应。将中美宪法的政治角色进行比较与对照,可以凸显中美宪法之间相异的逻辑、语境与背景。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of comparative constitutional law, the constitution of the United States has great isomorphism and comparability with the monarchs of the pre-modern countries, whether in the political system, the political process or the political identity. Therefore, the constitution of the United States is the product of the background of "post-monarchy." although the Chinese Constitution, which emerged in the early 20th century, also enjoys the name of the Constitution, it has assumed a reality from the time of its birth. Utilitarian mission: save the nation and save the nation and achieve prosperity. As a result, China's constitution is expected as a tool to make the country rich and strong. This role of Chinese constitution has a deep background of legalism, is the product of the traditional Chinese legalist theory, but also the product of the New warring States period. Fundamentally speaking, the doctrine of Legalism is the ideological response to the pattern of the New warring States. Comparing and contrasting the political roles of Chinese and American constitutions, we can highlight the different logic, context and background between Chinese and American constitutions.
【作者单位】：首都经济贸易大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(16XZX008)
【分类号】：D971.2;DD911;D921

【相似文献】