竹简秦汉律中的“以爵减、免、赎”非儒家“议爵”

发布时间：2018-04-27 05:18

本文选题：以爵减、免、赎 + 军功爵　；参考：《首都师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：竹简秦汉律有大量的有爵者可以享受法律特权的法令,极大地冲击了我们以往对秦汉律的认识。许多学者认为竹简秦汉律中"以爵减、免、赎"是儒家思想影响下的产物,称之为"议爵",并认为这表明竹简秦汉律中已经具有"八议"的雏形,甚至对法律儒家化理论提出否定与质疑。军功爵者享有的法律特权与儒家的"议爵"有着很大的不同,是法家法律特权思想的直接体现和具体实践。虽然竹简秦汉律中"以爵减、免、赎"和唐律中的"议爵"都主张有爵者享有法律特权,实行同罪异罚,但是这两种法律特权却有着很大的差别。从竹简秦汉律中"以爵减、免、赎"到唐律中的"议爵",其中经历了一个爵的法律特权的儒家化过程。
[Abstract]:Bamboo slips, laws of Qin and Han dynasties have a large number of people who can enjoy legal privileges, which greatly impacted our previous understanding of the laws of Qin and Han dynasties. Many scholars think that bamboo slips "abatement, exemption and redemption" in the laws of Qin and Han dynasties on bamboo slips are the product of Confucianism, which is called "discussing the Jue", and that this indicates that the laws of the Qin and Han dynasties on bamboo slips have already had the embryonic form of "eight discussions". Even the legal Confucian theory of negation and doubt. The legal privilege enjoyed by military meritorious men is quite different from the Confucian "Jue", and it is the direct embodiment and concrete practice of Legalist's thought of legal privilege. Although the bamboo slips, Qin and Han dynasties "to reduce, exempt, redeem" and Tang law in "Dian Jue" all advocate that there is a viscount to enjoy legal privileges, the implementation of different punishment for the same crime, but these two kinds of legal privileges are very different. From bamboo slips, Qin and Han dynasties law, "to reduce, exempt, redeem" to the Tang Dynasty law, which experienced a Jue's legal privilege of the Confucian process.
【作者单位】：首都师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：D929

【相似文献】