日本违约责任制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-30 04:08

本文选题：违约责任 + 归责原则　；参考：《山东大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：违约责任制度是合同法当中涉及内容比较广泛的一个制度。合同双方当事人不按照双方的约定履行合同义务或者履行合同义务不符合约定时,依照相关法律所要承担的责任。对于违约责任问题在法理论层面应该如何把握,自日本民法典制定以来一直存在着各种争论。“日本的违约责任在继承德国民法迟延、不能、不完全履行的三分体系”①以后,产生了围绕瑕疵担保责任的性质所产生的法定责任说和契约责任说的对立；解除效果中直接效果说、间接效果说、折中说的对立等。本文主要考察日本违约责任制度的相关内容以及最新动向,并通过和我国相关制度的比较,来获取有益启发。本文分为四个部分,分别为：日本民法典起草阶段关于违约责任的学说议论、民法典制定后关于违约责任的判例与学说的展开、日本民法的修改动向及违约责任的发展方向、浅析中日违约责任制度的异同。各个部分主要围绕违约责任的归责原则、违约责任的形式理论的历史变迁以及所产生的学说对立展开的。本文目的在于通过对日本违约责任制度相关内容的考察和中日违约责任制度间的比较,并对日本的违约责任制度的相关问题以及当前日本的违约责任制度的改革方向进行粗略的简析,探讨未来违约责任制度的发展方向以及未来东亚统一合同法的发展方向。
[Abstract]:The system of liability for breach of contract is a system involving a wide range of contents in contract law. If the parties to the contract do not perform their contractual obligations in accordance with the agreement of the two parties or if the performance of the contractual obligations does not conform to the agreement, the parties shall bear the responsibility under the relevant law. There have been various arguments on how to grasp the problem of liability for breach of contract in the legal theory since the Japanese Civil Code was formulated. After inheriting the three-point system of Germany's civil law, Japan's liability for breach of contract has produced the opposition between the theory of legal liability and the theory of contractual liability, which revolves around the nature of the liability for the guarantee of defects. The direct effect theory, the indirect effect theory, the compromise theory and so on. This paper mainly examines the relevant contents and the latest trends of Japan's liability for breach of contract system, and through the comparison with the relevant systems in China, to obtain useful inspiration. This paper is divided into four parts: the doctrine of liability for breach of contract in the drafting stage of the Japanese Civil Code, the case law and doctrine of liability for breach of contract after the formulation of the Civil Code, the trend of revision of the Japanese civil law and the development direction of the liability for breach of contract. An Analysis of the similarities and differences of the liability system of breach of contract between China and Japan. Each part mainly revolves around the principle of liability for breach of contract, the historical change of the formal theory of liability for breach of contract and the opposition of the theory. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relevant contents of the liability system of breach of contract in Japan and to compare the liability system of breach of contract between China and Japan. The paper also makes a brief analysis of the related problems of Japan's breach liability system and the reform direction of Japan's current breach liability system, and probes into the development direction of the future breach liability system and the future development direction of the unified contract law of East Asia.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D931.3;DD913

【参考文献】