当代英国司法改革历程——基于权力与制度的探讨

发布时间：2018-04-30 10:10

本文选题：司法改革 + 议会制　；参考：《甘肃社会科学》2017年05期

【摘要】：作为议会制的典型国家,英国在司法权力与司法制度层面,采取了与总统制国家截然不同的架构模式。自光荣革命以来,其长期推崇议会至上的传统,以议会为权力的中心并且刻意将立法、行政与司法三权融合、混同。但自20世纪始,出于对英国国内对司法改革诉求的回应,加之彼时欧洲一体化进程的展开,通过一系列的改革措施,英国对司法权与司法组织进行了有针对性的重构,一方面,司法组织开始由混同转向独立,另一方面,司法权也逐渐强势,使得"议会至上"的趋势在当代英国宪制中愈发显现。
[Abstract]:As a typical country of parliamentary system , Britain has adopted a distinct architectural pattern with the presidential system at the level of judicial power and judicial system . Since the glorious revolution , it has been a long - standing tradition of judicial reform . In the beginning of the 20th century , it has carried out a targeted restructuring of the judicial power and judicial organization . On the one hand , the judicial power has gradually become independent , and on the other hand , the judicial power gradually becomes strong , so that the trend of " parliamentary supremacy " is becoming more and more apparent in the contemporary British constitutional system .

【作者单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院;奥斯陆大学人权研究中心;
【分类号】：D956.1;DD916

【相似文献】