违反强制性法规的合同效力——基于瑞士法的考察

发布时间：2018-05-09 00:00

本文选题：强制性法规 + 违法内容　；参考：《华东政法大学学报》2017年01期

【摘要】：强制性法规,有多种类型。合同违反不同类型的强制性法规,其效力各异。故理论上应先区分不同类型的强制性法规,再分别考察合同违反此等法规的效力。瑞士学界和司法界认为,强制性法规有公法上的和私法上的两种。公法上法规,多为强制性,其理论重点不在此等法规强制性的识别上,而在合同违反此等法规的效力上。私法上法规多不具强制性,故此等法规强制性的认定为重点之一,违反此等强制性法规的合同效力为重点之二。借助审判实践,违反强制性法规的合同效力在瑞士法上得到一定程度的类型化。
[Abstract]:There are many types of mandatory regulations. Contracts violate different types of mandatory regulations and have different effects. Therefore, in theory, different types of mandatory laws and regulations should be distinguished, and then the validity of breach of these regulations should be investigated separately. The Swiss academic and judicial circles believe that there are two kinds of peremptory legislation: public law and private law. Laws and regulations in public law are mostly mandatory. The theoretical emphasis is not on the mandatory identification of these regulations, but on the validity of the breach of these laws by contract. Most laws and regulations in private law are not mandatory, so the mandatory recognition of these laws and regulations is one of the key points, and the second is the contract effectiveness of violating these mandatory laws and regulations. With the help of trial practice, the validity of contract in violation of compulsory laws and regulations has been classified to a certain extent in Swiss law.
【作者单位】：瑞士弗里堡大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“电子支付民事法律问题研究”(项目号14BFX164)的阶段性研究成果留学基金委留学基金资助
【分类号】：DD913;D952.2

【相似文献】