商业秘密不可避免披露理论研究

发布时间：2018-05-10 16:43

本文选题：商业秘密 + 不可避免披露　；参考：《华东政法大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：不可避免披露原则（Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine），是普通法于特定情形下，禁止极可能披露前雇主商业秘密的离职雇员就任特定新职的一套理论。在PepsiCo Inc. v. Redmond案判决以后，该原则几乎成为了解决雇佣领域商业秘密即发侵权纠纷案件的“万应药”。但是，由于该原则自身的缺陷——模糊的概念、模糊的适用要件与有待澄清的法理根据，其所遭致的非议也多。面对这样一个研究点，本文试图从普通法的制度分析出发，结合传统民法理论探寻其背后的法理，寻找其在中国法下的现实出路。本文共分四个章节。在第一章“不可避免披露原则概述”后，分别对该原则的三个问题进行了探索：普通法如何确定不可避免披露原则的适用要件？如何以传统民法理论解释不可避免披露原则背后的法理？如何借鉴普通法的适用经验，构建本国的商业秘密消除危险请求权制度？本文第一章为“不可避免披露原则概述”，在简要阐述该原则的概念后，介绍了普通法对其概念中Inevitable一词的争论，，说明学界已经认识到“不可避免”非“必然”之意；同时论证了该原则属于UTSA第2条规定的即发侵害制度。本文第二章为“不可避免披露原则适用要件研究”，旨在获取普通法的具体经验。在研究了不可避免披露原则的重要案例后，本章列出了普通法适用该原则时所考虑的因素，并根据普通法的价值取向将其分为两类——必要条件与加重因素，作为后文统一该原则适用要件时的参考。本文第三章为“不可避免披露原则之法理分析”，旨在用民法基本原理解释不可避免披露原则背后的法理。首先，笔者通过对前雇主的权利及其性质与离职雇员的义务及其性质的分析，证明了该原则可归入商业秘密消除危险制度。其次，笔者通过对消除危险制度的法理分析，结合“价值添附”理论，尝试回答了该原则的特殊救济方式，即表现为离职雇员不就任特定新职之债务的法理根据。最后，笔者运用“价值添附”理论尝试回答了离职雇员补偿金的法理根据：前雇主取得商业秘密与特定技能的总价值的归属权后，发生向离职雇员返还特定技能之对价的法定债务。本文第四章为“我国的立法现状与制度借鉴”，旨在为构建雇佣领域商业秘密消除危险制度提出一些浅薄的建议。首先，笔者介绍了我国的立法现状，结合海带配额案所引发的社会矛盾，指出我国有设立商业秘密消除危险制度的必要。其次，笔者根据普通法的经验，试着统一消除危险请求权之适用要件；并建议将请求不就任特定新职之债与请求不为披露之债一同规定为消除危险请求权之权能。最后，笔者讨论了消除危险禁令期限的确定方式：根据个案中商业秘密寿命的评估结论，确定合理的竞业禁止期限；同时讨论了补偿金的确定方式：以本技术领域内普通技术人员在禁令期限内应得的工资报酬为标准，确定补偿金数额。
[Abstract]:The inevitable disclosure principle (Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine) is a set of theory that the general law in a particular case prohibits the employees of the departing employees who are likely to disclose the former employer's business secrets. After the decision of the PepsiCo Inc. v. Redmond case, this principle has almost become a solution to the business secret of the employment field, that is, a tort dispute case. However, because of its own defects, the concept of fuzziness, the indistinct elements of application and the legal basis for clarification, it has been much more controversial. In the face of such a research point, this article tries to explore the legal theory behind the traditional civil law theory and seek its in China from the analysis of the system of ordinary law. The realistic way out under the law.
This article is divided into four chapters. After the first chapter, "an overview of the principle of inevitable disclosure", the three questions of the principle are explored respectively. How can the common law determine the applicable elements of the inevitable disclosure principle? How to explain the principles behind the inevitable disclosure principle with the traditional civil law theory and how to draw on the applicable experience of the common law, Build a national trade secret to eliminate the system of dangerous claims?
The first chapter of this article is "an overview of the principle of inevitable disclosure". After a brief introduction of the concept of the principle, the argument on the word "Inevitable" in the concept of common law is introduced, which shows that the academic circle has already recognized the meaning of "unavoidable" and not "inevitable", and that the principle belongs to the system of infringement of the second article of UTSA.
The second chapter of this article is "the study of the applicable elements of the inevitable disclosure principle", which aims to obtain the specific experience of the common law. After studying the important cases of the inevitable disclosure principle, this chapter lists the factors considered when the common law applies to the principle, and divides it into two categories according to the value orientation of the common law - the necessary conditions and the aggravation. As a reference for the unification of the principle.
The third chapter is the "jurisprudential analysis of the principle of inevitable disclosure", which aims to explain the jurisprudence behind the principle of inevitable disclosure by the basic principles of civil law. First, the author, through the analysis of the obligations and properties of the former employer's rights and its nature and the resigned employee, proves that the principle can be classified as a business secret to eliminate the danger system. Through the legal analysis of the elimination of danger system and the combination of the theory of "value added", the author tries to answer the special relief method of the principle, that is, the legal basis for the resigned employees not to take the responsibilities of a particular new job. Finally, the author uses the theory of "value added" to answer the legal basis of the compensation payment for the employee of the former employee: After obtaining the ownership of the business secret and the total value of the specific skills, the employer will return the statutory debt to the employees who have paid off the specific skills.
The fourth chapter of this article is "the present situation of our country's legislation and the reference of the system". It aims at making some shallow suggestions for the construction of the risk system of business secret in the field of employment. First, the author introduces the present situation of our country's legislation and combines the social contradictions caused by the case of the kelp quota, and points out the necessity of setting up a commercial secret to eliminate the danger system. Secondly, in accordance with the experience of ordinary law, the author tries to unify the applicable conditions of eliminating the right of danger request, and recommends that the request to remove the debt of a particular new job and the claim that the request is not disclosed is the right to eliminate the right of the claim. Finally, the author discusses the way to determine the time limit for the prohibition of the danger: according to the business secret in the case The assessment of the life expectancy will determine a reasonable period of prohibition of competition. At the same time, the method of determining the compensation is discussed: the amount of compensation is determined by the standard of salary paid by ordinary technical personnel within the time limit of this technology.

【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D920.0;D923.4

【参考文献】