论德国消费者撤回权

发布时间：2018-05-10 22:41

本文选题：消费者撤回权 + 消费者保护　；参考：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：德国消费者撤回权是德国消费者保护法律体系中最引人注目的制度,对德国消费者权益的保护发挥着巨大的且无法替代的作用,并产生了广泛的国际影响力,掀起了大陆法系消费者保护制度的革命。我国《消费者保护法》的修订工作正在进行之中,从已经公布的征求意见稿看,此次修订将引进消费者撤回权制度。当下,研究已经发展成熟的德国消费者撤回权制度无疑成为推动立法完善的助益之举。本文尝试综合运用历史分析、比较法分析、逻辑分析归纳、理论和实践分析结合的方法,研究德国消费者撤回权,并在此基础上探讨其对我国完善消费者保护制度的借鉴意义。全文共分五大部分: 第一部分为消费者撤回权概述。主要介绍了消费者撤回权的概念和特征,系统梳理消费者撤回权的历史沿革,并从传统民法和消费者保护法的角度探讨了消费者撤回权的法律性质。本文认为消费者撤回权是一项特别的消费者撤回权,也是一项独立的消费者权。第二部分为消费者撤回权的制度构造。在该部分中,笔者对消费者撤回权的制度构造进行了系统介绍。从消费者撤回权的适用范围、权利行使、除斥期间、法律效果四个部分研究德国消费者的制度内容。第三部分为消费者撤回权对私法传统的突破。该部分主要探讨消费者撤回权的主要理论创新之处。本文认为消费者撤回权发端于传统私法又突破了传统私法的理论范式,具有独特的理论价值,这也是消费者撤回权制度的最大理论问题。本文将消费者撤回权的理论创新归纳为三个方面:权利主体上对平等原则的突破、权利功能上对契约自由原则的突破、权利效果上对契约严守原则的突破。第四部分为消费者撤回权的正当性基础。笔者在本部分主要尝试运用多学科的研究方法探讨消费者的正当性基础,是对消费者撤回权理论创新的多角度论证,是第三部分的延续和深华。本文认为消费者撤回权有坚实的哲学基础、经济学基础和社会学基础。从哲学角度观察,消费者撤回权是实质正义勃兴的结果;从经济学角度观察,消费者撤回权是消费者和经营者利益博弈所形成的消费者主权在法律上的体现;从社会学角度观察,消费者撤回权是消费社会的产物,也是消费社会的保障。第五部分为德国消费者撤回权对完善我国消费者保护制度的借鉴意义。该部分主要尝试立足我国消费者保护实践,探讨消费者撤回权在我国确立的必要性、可行性和具体的立法方案。本文认为我消费者保护现状不容乐观,相关法律制度较为落后,借鉴德国消费者撤回权大有必要。且我国民法和消费者法理论研究已经较为成熟,部分地区已经进行了立法实践,部分经营者已经自发进行了相关实践,因此,我国已经具备了引进该制度的理论和实践基础。在论证了必要和可行性的基础上,本文提出借鉴德国消费者撤回权完善我国消费者保护制度的方案。
[Abstract]:The revocation of German consumers is the most noticeable system in the German consumer protection law system, which plays a huge and irreplaceable role in the protection of the rights and interests of the German consumer, and has produced extensive international influence and set off the revolution of the system of consumer protection in the civil law system. In the course of it, from the published solicitation draft, this revision will introduce the system of consumer withdrawal right. At the moment, the study of the mature German consumer withdrawal system has undoubtedly become a beneficial action to promote the perfection of the legislation. This article tries to make a comprehensive use of historical analysis, comparative law analysis, logical analysis and induction, theory and practice. The method of combination is used to study the withdrawal right of German consumers, and on this basis, it discusses its reference significance for perfecting the consumer protection system in China.
The full text is divided into five parts:
The first part is an overview of the right of consumer withdrawal. It mainly introduces the concept and characteristics of the right of consumer withdrawal, systematically combs the historical evolution of the right of consumer withdrawal, and probes into the legal nature of the right of withdrawal of consumers from the perspective of the traditional civil law and consumer protection law. It's an independent consumer right.
The second part is the institutional structure of the right to withdraw the consumer. In this part, the author systematically introduces the institutional structure of the right to withdraw the consumer. From the scope of the application of the right of the withdrawal of consumers, the exercise of rights, the period of exclusion, and the legal effect, the content of the system of the German consumer is studied in four parts.
The third part is the breakthrough of the consumer withdrawal right to the tradition of private law. This part mainly discusses the main theoretical innovation of the right of consumer withdrawal. This article holds that the right of consumer withdrawal, which originates from the traditional private law, breaks through the theoretical paradigm of the traditional private law and has unique theoretical value. This is the biggest theoretical problem of the system of consumer withdrawal. In this paper, the theoretical innovation of the right of consumer withdrawal is summed up in three aspects: the breakthrough of the principle of equality on the subject of rights, the breakthrough of the principle of freedom of contract in the right and function, and the breakthrough of the principle of strict adherence to the contract in the effect of rights.
The fourth part is the justification basis of the right to withdraw the consumer. In this part, the author tries to explore the legitimacy basis of the consumer by using multidisciplinary research methods. It is a multi angle demonstration of the theory innovation of the consumer withdrawal right and the continuation and deep China of the third part. This article holds that the withdrawal rights of the consumers have a solid philosophical foundation, economics From a philosophical point of view, the right of consumer withdrawal is the result of substantial justice. From an economic perspective, the right to withdraw consumers is a legal embodiment of consumer sovereignty which is formed by the interests of consumers and operators. From a sociological perspective, the right to withdraw consumers is the product of the consumer society. The security of the consumer society.
The fifth part is the reference significance of the German consumer withdrawal right to consummate the system of consumer protection in our country. This part mainly tries to discuss the necessity, feasibility and specific legislative plan of the establishment of consumer withdrawal right in our country based on the practice of consumer protection in our country. This article holds that the present situation of the protection of the consumer is not optimistic and the relevant legal system is concerned. It is more backward, it is necessary to draw lessons from the German consumers' right to withdraw. And the theory of civil law and consumer law is more mature in our country. Some areas have already carried out legislative practice. Some of the operators have carried out the relevant practice spontaneously. Therefore, our country has already had the theoretical and practical basis of introducing the system. On the basis of behavior, this paper proposes a plan to improve the consumer protection system by drawing on German consumers' right of withdrawal.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D951.6;DD913

【参考文献】