中俄资格刑制度比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-11 12:24

本文选题：资格刑 + 剥夺政治权利　；参考：《新疆大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：资格刑是一种古老的刑罚，它剥夺的是犯罪人享有或行使一定权力的资格。和古代社会的肉体刑相比，它体现了社会的进步性，和现在的自由刑、财产刑相比，它在特殊预防犯罪上有着独特的优势。资格刑的发展和完善有利于保护人权，对人类法治文明发展有着重要的贡献。本文对中俄资格刑的内容、产生的历史背景、具体规定等角度进行比较分析，提出完善措施，以期对我国资格刑的发展有所帮助。本文分为五部分，第一部分是资格刑概述，介绍了我国资格刑的一般理论和资格刑体现的刑罚价值，包括我国资格刑从古至今的发展过程、名称和种类的演变。第二部分阐述了国外资格刑的法律规定，包括最早罗马法中的规定、近代主要发达国家的法律规定和国际公约上的规定，从纵向和横向两个角度来论述。第三部分是中俄资格刑比较，具体比较中俄资格刑产生的历史条件、法条、种类和期限，通过比较找出两者的相同点，以及各自的特点。第四部分论述我国资格刑和俄罗斯资格刑相比,存在的缺陷和不足，从名称、内容、适用对象和实践效果来讨论。第五部分是对我国资格刑刑事立法的完善，，包括对驱逐出境和剥夺政治权利的修改建议和增设新的资格刑种类建议。
[Abstract]:Qualification penalty is an ancient penalty, which deprives the criminal of the right to enjoy or exercise certain rights. Compared with the physical punishment in ancient society, it embodies the progressive nature of the society, compared with the present free punishment, property punishment, it has a unique advantage in the special crime prevention. The development and perfection of qualification penalty is beneficial to the protection of human rights and has important contribution to the development of civilization of human rule of law. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the contents, historical background and specific provisions of the qualification penalty between China and Russia, and puts forward some perfect measures in order to help the development of the qualification penalty in our country. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part is an overview of the qualification penalty. It introduces the general theory of the qualification penalty and the penalty value embodied in the qualification penalty, including the development process, the name and the evolution of the type of the qualification penalty from ancient to present. The second part expounds the legal provisions of foreign qualification penalty, including the provisions of the earliest Roman law, the legal provisions of modern major developed countries and the provisions of international conventions, from the vertical and horizontal perspectives. The third part is the comparison of the Chinese and Russian qualification penalty, the specific comparison of the historical conditions, legal provisions, types and duration, and find out the similarities between the two, as well as their respective characteristics. The fourth part discusses the defects and shortcomings of Chinese qualification penalty compared with Russian qualification penalty, from the name, content, applicable object and practical effect. The fifth part is the perfection of the criminal legislation of qualification penalty in our country, including the modification of deportation and deprivation of political rights and the suggestion of adding new types of qualification penalty.
【学位授予单位】：新疆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D924.1;D951.2

【参考文献】