美国专利创造性判断的调整及对我国的启示

发布时间：2018-05-11 14:43

本文选题：专利 + 创造性　；参考：《华东政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：授予发明专利必须满足的三个实质性条件为:新颖性、创造性、实用性。其中,发明专利的创造性是指同申请日以前已有的技术相比,该发明有突出的实质性特点和显著的进步。但是专利创造性的判断标准比较难把握,主观性很强。对此,创造性判断的发展经历了从主观到客观的过程,随后创造性判断又出现了过度客观化的问题。针对该问题,美国KSR案对专利创造性的判断做出了调整。目前我国科技发展迅速,专利申请数量激剧增长,如何把握专利创造性的标准尤其重要,因此有必要借鉴美国的做法,对我国专利创造性问题进行研究。本文分为三个章节。第一章介绍了专利现状及出现的问题。第一节介绍专利创造性的概念。第二节介绍了我国专利创造性判断的发展。第三节提出了专利创造性发展中出现的过度客观化问题,论述了该问题造成的影响以及对我国专利创造性的考验。第二章分析了美国专利的创造性。第一节介绍了美国KSR案之前专利创造性的判断内容。第二节阐述了美国KSR案对专利创造性判断做出的调整。第三节结合美国KSR案前后专利创造性性审查的两个案例,深入分析美国专利创造性的判断标准。第三章通过比较中美两国专利创造性判断的异同,得出我国专利创造性存在的问题,提出专利创造性判断的改进意见。意见包括修正本领域技术人员的定义,完善显而易见性的检验方法。期望这些建议能够满足专利创造性判断与我国技术发展相适应要求,鼓励创新,促进我国社会的持续健康发展。
[Abstract]:The three essential conditions for granting patent for invention are novelty, creativity and practicality. The creativity of the invention patent means that the invention has outstanding substantive characteristics and remarkable progress compared with the technology that existed before the application date. But the judgement standard of patent creativity is difficult to grasp, subjectivity is very strong. Therefore, the development of creative judgment has gone through the process from subjective to objective, and then the problem of excessive objectivity of creative judgment has appeared. In view of this problem, the US KSR case adjusts the judgment of patent creativity. At present, with the rapid development of science and technology in China, the number of patent applications has increased dramatically. It is particularly important to grasp the standards of patent creativity. Therefore, it is necessary to study the problem of patent creativity in China by drawing lessons from the practices of the United States. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter introduces the current situation and problems of patent. The first section introduces the concept of patent creativity. The second section introduces the development of patent creative judgment in China. The third section puts forward the problem of excessive objectivity in the development of patent creativity, and discusses the influence of this problem and the test of patent creativity in China. The second chapter analyzes the creativity of American patents. The first section introduces the content of the original patent judgment before the KSR case in the United States. The second section expounds the adjustment of the patent creative judgment made in the KSR case of the United States. In the third section, combining two cases of patent creativity examination before and after the KSR case in the United States, the author deeply analyzes the judgment standard of patent creativity in the United States. In chapter three, by comparing the differences and similarities of patent creative judgment between China and the United States, we find out the existing problems of patent creativity in China, and put forward some suggestions for improvement of patent creative judgment. Suggestions include revising the definition of technical personnel in the field and perfecting the test method for obviousness. It is hoped that these suggestions can meet the requirements of patent creative judgment and technological development in China, encourage innovation and promote the sustainable and healthy development of our society.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.42;D971.2

【相似文献】