日本反垄断法课征金制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-17 15:32

本文选题：课征金制度 + 反垄断法　；参考：《中南大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：课征金制度是日本反垄断法特有的行政责任制度。自1977年引入以来,经过三十余年间几次重大的修改,课征金制度已经成为日本反垄断法责任制度的核心,对保障日本反垄断法的实施起到了积极的作用。课征金制度内容框架的设置主要分为四个基本方面：课征金征收的对象行为；课征金金额的计算方法；基于宽大处理机制的减免制度；课征金的征缴程序。从课征金制度的内容以及发展历程来看,都是极富日本特色的。在性质上,与其他国家的行政罚款制度不同,课征金是兼有没收违法所得与行政罚款的双重性质的；相比各国反垄断法而言,其在制度设计上较为僵化；在实施机制上,具有实施机构唯一和程序设置高度效率的特征；从其发展来看,判例法的推动起了很大作用。由于日本与我国的法律文化以及国情上有许多相似之处,课征金制度的优点值得我国反垄断法有针对性的加以借鉴。我国在反垄断法总体的法律责任制度的选择上,应当坚持“行政罚款中心主义”的做法,这不仅是世界反垄断法的普遍做法,也是反垄断法“慎刑”原则的要求。此外,我国应当立足自身国情参考课征金制度的经验对行政罚款制度从以下几个方面进行完善：行政罚款的上限额度应当达到巨额的程度；对减免制度适用规则加以明确；适当限制行政罚款的自由裁量权；对中小企业应予以适当的照顾。
[Abstract]:The levy system is the special administrative responsibility system of Japanese anti-monopoly law. Since its introduction in 1977, the levy system has become the core of the liability system of the anti-monopoly law in Japan, and has played an active role in ensuring the implementation of the anti-monopoly law in Japan. The content frame of the levy system is mainly divided into four basic aspects: the object behavior of the levy, the calculation method of the levy amount, the relief system based on leniency mechanism, and the collection procedure of the levy. From the content and development of the levy system, it is full of Japanese characteristics. In nature, unlike the administrative penalty systems of other countries, the levy is of the dual nature of confiscation of illegal income and administrative fine; compared with the anti-monopoly laws of various countries, it is more rigid in system design; and in the implementation mechanism, It has the characteristics of only implementing institution and high efficiency of procedure setting; from its development, case law plays a great role. Since there are many similarities between Japan and China's legal culture and national conditions, the advantages of the levy system are worthy of our country's anti-monopoly law to use for reference. On the choice of the overall legal liability system of anti-monopoly law, we should adhere to the practice of "administrative penalty centralism", which is not only the universal practice of the world anti-monopoly law, but also the requirement of the principle of "careful punishment" of the anti-monopoly law. In addition, our country should base on our own national conditions to refer to the experience of levy system to perfect the administrative penalty system from the following aspects: the upper limit of administrative penalty should reach a huge degree, the applicable rules of relief system should be clear; The discretion of administrative penalty should be restricted appropriately, and appropriate care should be given to small and medium enterprises.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D931.3;DD912.29

【参考文献】