墨家论辩逻辑在法庭论辩中的应用

发布时间：2018-05-19 20:23

本文选题：辟 + 侔　；参考：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：法庭论辩是法庭审理案件的重要内容，是控、辩双方（或原、被告双方），围绕本方的诉讼请求，在证据和法律规定的基础上按照法定程序所进行的论证与辩驳。以墨翟为代表的我国古代墨家智者在春秋战国时期百家争鸣、辩诘之风盛行的历史环境下所创立的辩学体系对现代法庭论辩仍有重要的指导作用。本文共分为四部分：第一部分讨论墨辩逻辑与现代论辩对于辩的定义以及辩胜的标准。这一部分分别探讨了墨辩逻辑、竞技论辩与法庭论辩各自对于辩的定义以及辩胜的标准，并分析对比了其中的异同。第二部分介绍了墨辩逻辑中用以进行论辩的工具。这一部分分别从知识获取以及名、实、辞、意的角度探讨了墨辩逻辑中用以辩论的工具，，并介绍了对法庭论辩的特殊意义。第三部分介绍了墨辩逻辑中的证成。这一部分分别从指导思想和具体技法的角度对墨辩逻辑中的证成进行了介绍，并探讨了如何将墨家论辩的原则和技法运用于法庭论辩中。第四部分与第三部分相对应，介绍了墨辩逻辑中的反驳。这一部分同样从指导思想和具体技法的角度对墨辩逻辑中的反驳进行了介绍，并试图将其运用到法庭论辩之中。通过这四个部分的分析研究，本文整理出了墨家论辩术的基本脉络与主要内容，将其初步作用法庭论辩的特殊场合，希望对现代法庭论辩发挥其应有的作用。
[Abstract]:Court argumentation is an important content of hearing a case by the court. It is the argumentation and rebuttal of the two sides (or the original defendant and the defendant) according to the legal procedure on the basis of the evidence and the legal stipulation. The ancient Mohist wise man, represented by Mo-Zhai, was still playing an important role in guiding the modern court debate under the historical environment of a hundred schools of thought contending in the Spring and Autumn period and the warring States period. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part discusses the definition of debate and the standard of argument. In this part, the author discusses the definition of debate and the standard of victory respectively, and analyzes and compares the similarities and differences among them. The second part introduces the tools used in the argument logic. This part discusses the tools of debate in Mohist logic from the angle of knowledge acquisition, name, truth, speech and meaning, and introduces the special significance of court debate. The third part introduces the evidence in Mohist argument logic. This part introduces the evidence in Mohist argument logic from the angle of guiding ideology and specific techniques, and discusses how to apply the principles and techniques of Mohist argument to court debate. The fourth part, corresponding to the third part, introduces the rebuttal in Mohist argument logic. This part also introduces the rebuttal in Mohist logic from the angle of guiding ideology and concrete techniques, and tries to apply it to court argument. Through the analysis and study of these four parts, this paper arranges the basic context and main contents of Mohist argumentation, and puts its preliminary effect on the special occasion of the court debate, hoping to play its due role in the modern court debate.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90-051

【参考文献】