基于关系视角的法律与文学研究

发布时间：2018-05-19 18:55

本文选题：法律与文学 + 关系视角　；参考：《吉林大学》2012年博士论文

【摘要】：“法律与文学是什么”是法律与文学不断追问的核心问题,亦构成了法律与文学理论研究的根本性问题。作为一门新兴的跨学科研究,法律与文学首先要确证它自身的存在及其存在的合理性与独特价值,但目前的法律与文学还没有形成理论通说,乃至是否为学派都颇受争议,这不仅是法律与文学发展的最大理论障碍,成为法律与文学理论研究最急迫解决的理论问题,同时也是本文所试图回答的根本问题。全文共分为7个章节。第1章导论部分介绍了选题的形成与问题的提出、国内外研究现状与存在的局限以及论文的逻辑结构与设计理由。法律与文学理论的特殊性与多面性决定了要采取不同于其他法学学派、法学思想的认识路径与方式,本文对法律与文学理论研究的基本定位设置在与其他相关法学学派的关系视角上。本文选取了四个关系视角,即法律与经济学、法律与社会学、后现代法学以及法学教育,形成四种法律与文学类型,即作为反法律与经济学的法律与文学、作为法律与社会学的法律与文学、作为后现代法学的法律与文学以及作为法学教育的法律与文学,以期回答“法律与文学是什么”这道难题。第2章起始于对法律与文学学科史的概述：对从柏拉图到后现代法律与文学学术形态的起源、发展与流变进行梳理,展示法律与文学的动态发展过程,同时也是对不断回答法律和文学之间关系、回答“法律与文学是什么”的学术智识资源的总结,以文学中的法律与作为文学的法律二者的动态关系为审视视角来重塑法律与文学的发展史,将其分为发轫、确立与扩张的三个阶段。对法律与文学二分法的超越,必然建立在对二分法充分认识的前提之上,同时要破除法律与文学分裂宿命论的神话,进而形成对法律与文学的整合或一体化理解。通过对基于二分法视角的法律与文学学术史的梳理,本章集中展示出这一领域之分裂的趋势与整合的努力之间的矛盾与对抗,显示出法律与文学理论的多样性与复杂性,也为下文的讨论提供了理论背景,奠定了理论基调。第3章重点探讨了第一个关系视角,即作为反法律与经济学的法律与文学。同为法学跨学科研究的法律与文学和法律与经济学之间存在同生相异关系上,法律与文学对经济人假设的不合理与负面效应的质疑与批判影响或催生了其对文学人理念的建构,具有移情能力的文学人集中反映出法律与文学的基本主张,为法律理论人的塑造提供了一种新的可能。文学人与经济人之间的巨大差异可最终归结于文学语言与经济学语言,或者更准确地说文学话语与经济学话语之间在本质上的矛盾,这又生动体现在文学话语的人文属性与经济学话语的科学属性之间的冲突上面。文学话语是对当代主流法理学形式的拒绝,文学话语的增长也为法律话语的建构提供了一种新的可能。第4章探讨第二个关系视角,即作为法律与社会学的法律与文学。后现代史学观的助力突破了传统的法律与社会学获取信息资料的一般方式而将文学作品纳入到其考量范围之内。法律与社会学统摄下的法律与文学表现出来的工具性特征将法律与文学以工具形式整合进广义法律与社会学当中构成了最弱意义上的法律与文学。本文引入文本形态论来对其进行反思与评价,将笼统使用的文本概念区分出三种既彼此联系又相互区别的文本形态,即文学作品、拟制案件与真实案件,认为文学文本中的人文指向应当也必须得到承认与保留。第5章探讨第三个关系视角,即作为后现代法学的法律与文学。理解后现代法学的一个重要手段就是把握后现代哲学思想的基本精神。法理学的后现代转向是在整体意义上的一个转向,后现代哲学与文学理论以及批判法学运动为法律与文学在新时期的发展提供了丰富的理论资源,法理学的后现代转向而使得后现代同法律与文学的联系愈加频繁与紧密。随后本文集中于解释学转向、想象阅读与讲故事即对应以文本为中心的解释、阅读与叙述三方面对法律与文学的后现代动向进行分析与说明。第6章文章转向作为法学教育的法律与文学,将法律与文学的理论研究落脚于教育实践之中,以重申法律与文学的教育目的为基本方向,对法律与文学所产出的诸多理论产品进行归纳与总结。本文就法律与文学课进行了详尽的对比分析,对法律与文学课的形式与概况、法律与文学课的分类与主题、法律与文学课的教学目的以及法律与文学课的文本选择等方面进行了分析与阐述,并进一步指出在助力法律伦理教育、完善法学知识结构、更新课堂教学模式等三方面法律与文学课将有可能给国内的法学教育提供较为的新颖、可靠,同时又赋有启发性与创造性的教学模式。第7章结语部分,本文对前文的研究进行了简要总结并展望了中国法律与文学的未来的发展前景。西方法律与文学的发展厘定了中国法律与文学研究的基本理论方向,中国社会转型期法治现代化的大背景决定了中国法律与文学研究的现实维度,法律与文学深厚的传统资源构成了中国法律与文学研究的超越维度。文章着重论述了四种法律与文学理论类型的内在关联,指出它们将会在某种程度上,以某种形式参与到中国未来的法律与文学的理论建构当中。随着我国法律与文学理论研究的深入与法学教育阵地的开拓,法律与文学将逐步走向发展的第二阶段,在准确理解与充分消化国外智识资源,缩短与西方学术界在思想观念以及前沿理论传播等差距的前提下,发掘中国法律与文学的丰富资源,法律与文学会在更广阔的空间里有所作为。
[Abstract]:"What is law and literature" is the core question of law and literature, which also constitutes the fundamental question of the study of legal and literary theory. As a new interdisciplinary study, law and literature must first confirm its existence, its existence, its existence and its unique value, but the present law and literature are still not in shape. It is not only the biggest theoretical obstacle in the development of law and literature, but also the most urgent theoretical problem to be solved in the study of the theory of law and literature. It is also the fundamental question that this article tries to answer.
The full text is divided into 7 chapters. The introduction part of the first chapter introduces the formation and problems of the topic, the status and limitations of the research at home and abroad, the logical structure and the reason for the design of the paper. The particularity and multifaceted nature of the theory of law and literature decides to adopt different ways and ways of understanding the thought of law, which are different from other jurisprudence. In this paper, the basic orientation of the study of legal and literary theory is set up in the perspective of the relationship with other relevant schools of law. This article selects four relations of view, namely, law and economics, law and sociology, post-modern law and law education, forming four kinds of legal and literary types, that is, law and literature as anti law and economics, As law and literature of law and sociology, as the law and literature of post modern jurisprudence, as well as the law and literature as a legal education, it is expected to answer the question of "what is law and literature".
The second chapter begins with an overview of the history of law and Literature: the origin, development and rheology of the legal and literary forms of Platon to postmodernism, the dynamic development of law and literature, and the academic intellectual capital to answer the relationship between law and literature and answer "what is law and literature" The summary of the source is to reshape the history of the development of law and literature with the dynamic relationship between the law in literature and the two parties as the law of literature. It is divided into three stages of origin, establishment and expansion. The transcendence of the dichotomy of law and literature is based on the premise that the dichotomy is fully understood, and the law and the law should be removed. It separates the myth of fatalism, and then forms the integration or integration of law and literature. By combing the law and literary history of literature based on the dichotomy, this chapter shows the contradiction and confrontation between the trend of the division and the efforts of the integration, and shows the diversity and complexity of the theory of law and literature. The miscellaneous nature also provides a theoretical background for the discussion below and lays a theoretical keynote.
The third chapter focuses on the first relationship perspective, which is the law and literature of anti law and economics. The constructivism of the idea of the scholar, the literary man with empathic ability concentrates on the basic proposition of the law and literature, and provides a new possibility for the creation of the legal theory. The great differences between the literary and economic people can be attributed to the literary and economic languages, or more accurately the literary discourse and the economic discourse. The contradiction between the essence is vividly embodied in the conflict between the humanistic attribute of literary discourse and the scientific attribute of the economic discourse. Literary discourse is a refusal to the contemporary mainstream jurisprudence, and the growth of literary discourse also provides a new possibility for the construction of legal discourse.
The fourth chapter discusses the second relations of view, which is the law and literature of the law and sociology. The post modern historiography view breaks through the general way of obtaining information from the traditional law and sociology and integrates the literary works into the scope of its consideration. The law and literature are integrated into the broad sense of law and literature in the general law and sociology with the integration of law and literature into the broad sense of law and sociology. This article introduces the text form theory to reflect and evaluate it, and divides the general text concept area into three types of text forms which are not only connected but also different from each other, that is, literary works, and the preparation of cases and In real cases, the humanistic orientation in literary texts should also be recognized and preserved.
The fifth chapter discusses the third relations of view, which is the law and literature of postmodern law. An important means to understand postmodern jurisprudence is to grasp the basic spirit of postmodern philosophy. The Post-modern Turn of jurisprudence is a turn in the whole meaning, and the postmodern philosophy and literary theory and the movement of critical law are the law and the law. Literature has provided rich theoretical resources in the development of the new period, and the Post-modern Turn of jurisprudence makes the post modern connection with the law and literature more frequent and close. Then this article focuses on the hermeneutic turn, imagining reading and telling stories that correspond to text as the central interpretation, reading and narration after the three aspects of the law and literature. Modern trends are analyzed and explained.
The sixth chapter turns to the law and literature of law education. The theoretical study of law and literature falls on the educational practice. In order to reaffirm the educational purpose of law and literature as the basic direction, many theoretical products produced by law and literature are summed up and summarized. This article makes a detailed comparison and analysis of the law and literature course. This paper analyzes and expounds the forms and general situation of law and literature, the classification and theme of the law and literature course, the teaching purpose of law and literature course and the text selection of the law and literature course, and further points out the three aspects of legal ethics education, perfecting the knowledge structure of law, and renewing the mode of classroom teaching. And literature course will provide a relatively new, reliable, and enlightening and creative teaching mode for domestic legal education.
The seventh chapter makes a brief summary of the previous study and prospects the future of Chinese law and literature. The development of western law and literature defines the basic theoretical direction of the study of Chinese law and literature. The great background of the modernization of the rule of law in the period of social transition in China determines the study of Chinese law and literature. The realistic dimension, the profound traditional resources of law and literature constitute the transcendental dimension of the study of Chinese law and literature. The article focuses on the internal relations between the four kinds of legal and literary theories, and points out that they will, to some extent, participate in the theoretical construction of China's future law and literature in some form. With the law of China The development of law and literary theory and the field of legal education, law and literature will gradually move towards the second stage of development. Under the premise of accurately understanding and fully digesting foreign intellectual resources and shortening the gap between the ideological concept and the propagation of frontier theories in the western academic circles, the rich resources of Chinese law and literature are excavated, and the law is explored. And the arts society is in a wider space.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D90-05

【参考文献】