国家法与民间法的效力场域及其配置机制

发布时间：2018-05-27 21:47

本文选题：国家法 + 民间法　；参考：《原生态民族文化学刊》2017年02期

【摘要】：作为建构理性的国家法讲究的是法律面前人人平等,追求普遍正义,因此,普遍性和统一性是其必不可少的基本特性。权利义务明确,是非分明是国家法固有的规范要求。谦让与协作的内部人关系显然与国家法格格不入。故此,唯有国家强制力才是保障其实施的有效力量。反之,作为经验理性的民间法,随具体语境而变化,顾及具体情况,以特殊正义为依归。价值认同与社会舆论命定是民间法得以实施的坚强后盾。正因如此,利益算计的契约型社会是国家法大显身手的主战场,而温情脉脉的伙伴型社会是民间法得心应手的天然平台。当代中国社会既不是纯粹的契约型社会,也不是百分百的伙伴型社会。因此,从善治角度讲,中国法治不应当是国家法独治,而应当是国家法与民间法共治。法律渊源的顺序设置、制定法的授权以及不确定法律概念和一般条款正是它们的沟通渠道及共治的有效机制。
[Abstract]:As a rational national law, it stresses the equality of everyone before the law and the pursuit of universal justice. Therefore, universality and unity are its essential basic characteristics. The right and duty is clear, right and wrong is the national law inherent norm request. The insiders of humility and cooperation are clearly out of step with state law. Therefore, only the national coercive force is the effective force to guarantee its implementation. On the contrary, the folk law, as an empirical reason, changes with the specific context, taking into account the specific circumstances and taking the special justice as the basis. Value identity and public opinion are the strong backing for the implementation of folk law. Therefore, the contractual society of profit calculation is the main battlefield of the national law, and the kind-hearted partner society is the natural platform of the folk law. Contemporary Chinese society is neither a purely contractual society nor a 100% partnership society. Therefore, from the point of view of good governance, the rule of law in China should not be ruled by the state law alone, but by the state law and the folk law. The establishment of the order of legal sources, the authorization of statutory law, and the uncertainty of legal concepts and general provisions are their communication channels and effective mechanism of co-governance.
【作者单位】：广东培正学院法学系;
【基金】：广东省高校特色创新(人文社科类)项目“依法治国背景下我国裁判规则多元化研究”(2015WTSCX111) 2016年广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划共建课题“依法治国背景下广州市基层社会治理多元规则优化配置机制研究”(2016GZGJ47)
【分类号】：D90-052

【相似文献】