日本著作权间接侵害之考

发布时间：2018-06-07 03:03

本文选题：著作权间接侵权 + 卡拉　；参考：《法学杂志》2014年09期

【摘要】：著作权间接侵害的关键是是否可以认可停止请求,现行《日本著作权法》对此没有明确的界定,因此,著作权间接侵害的停止请求权的可否性及其范围成为日本争论的焦点和立法的课题。根据日本近年来出现的著作权间接侵权相关案例的纷争类型,虽然可以将侵权类型分为场所机会提供型、工具提供型、系统提供型三种,但依然存在继续考察和讨论的余地。我国学术界提出的著作权间接侵权表现类型与日本间接侵权的三大类型相比,稍显注重法条规定中出现词语的机械套用。此外,日本就构成间接侵权的认定、在法理上如何形成间接侵权的有效救济,特别是停止侵害救济的可行性等问题的提出,对我国在立法和学术研究方面给予了一定的借鉴参考。
[Abstract]:Whether the key to indirect infringement of copyright can be recognized as a stop request is not clearly defined in the current Japanese copyright Law, therefore, The possibility and scope of the suspension claim of indirect infringement of copyright has become the focus of debate and legislation in Japan. According to the dispute types of indirect copyright infringement cases in Japan in recent years, although the infringement types can be divided into three types: place opportunity supply type, tool supply type and system supply type, there is still room for further investigation and discussion. Compared with the three types of indirect infringement of copyright in Japan, the academic circles of our country pay more attention to the mechanical application of the words and expressions in the provisions of the law, compared with the three types of indirect infringement of copyright in Japan. In addition, Japan has put forward the question of how to form effective relief for indirect infringement, especially the feasibility of stopping infringement relief, in respect of the determination of indirect infringement. To our country in legislation and academic research to give some reference.
【作者单位】：兰州大学法学院;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“著作权间接侵权研究”(项目编号:14LZUJBWZY061)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D931.3;DD913

【参考文献】